I don't have any real good suggestions. I looked at the Optum Financial form that I think was used and is says that Optum Financial will not calculate the NIA. I don't think that it's practical to ...
See more...
I don't have any real good suggestions. I looked at the Optum Financial form that I think was used and is says that Optum Financial will not calculate the NIA. I don't think that it's practical to simply obtain a distribution of an amount equal to the NIA that should have been distributed then and distribute that now, particularly because that amount has remained in the account experiencing investment gains and losses. What might make sense is to treat the original distribution as a distribution of some combined amount of excess contribution and NIA, then obtain a return of excess contribution or the remaining excess. For example, if the percentage of NIA at the time of the $2,150 distribution was, say, 15%, that distribution could be treated as a return of $1,870 of excess contribution plus $280 of NIA. In this example that would result in $280 of excess left to be returned, subject to it's own separate NIA calculation (a different percentage due to gains or losses in the account subsequent to the first distribution). With both distributions done, they will be combined on a single code 2 2026 Form 1099-SA which will show the correct total amount distributed in box 1 but an incorrect amount of NIA in box 2a. This approach would require entering into 2026 TurboTax a Form 1099-SA showing the correct amount for NIA, then printing and mailing the tax return with an explanation of why the amount reported in box 2 is incorrect and explaining calculation of the actual NIA on the two distributions. (Unlike for Forms 1099-R, there is no substitute form like Form 4852 that can be used to report an erroneous Form 1099-SA.)