- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
NC vested as of 8/12/1989
i think i may have check some box wrong etc. i was indeed NC vested as of 8/12/1989 and it gives me message of i won't have to pay tax on $20,182.14 rollover from local government employees then it says check rules to make sure you qualified to roll over your IRA?? I don't know what that means?
Topics:
1 Best answer
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
NC vested as of 8/12/1989
As long as you rolled ALL of it into an IRA within 60days, then you indicate that on the pages that follow that 1099-R form and it won't be taxed.
Your bigger issue is that once rolled into an IRA, you can no longer claim "Bailey Settlement" for any $$ you take out of that account...you have lost the ability to claim that the $$ are qualified for exemption from NC taxes.
"qualifying tax-exempt Bailey benefits rolled over into another retirement plan lose their character and would not be exempt upon distribution from the other plan unless that plan is a qualifying Bailey retirement account in which the employee was vested as of August 12, 1989. (Rollovers to IRAs will always result in a loss of tax-exempt status since IRAs do not qualify under the Bailey settlement.)"
Your bigger issue is that once rolled into an IRA, you can no longer claim "Bailey Settlement" for any $$ you take out of that account...you have lost the ability to claim that the $$ are qualified for exemption from NC taxes.
"qualifying tax-exempt Bailey benefits rolled over into another retirement plan lose their character and would not be exempt upon distribution from the other plan unless that plan is a qualifying Bailey retirement account in which the employee was vested as of August 12, 1989. (Rollovers to IRAs will always result in a loss of tax-exempt status since IRAs do not qualify under the Bailey settlement.)"
____________*Answers are correct to the best of my knowledge when posted, but should not be considered to be legal or official tax advice.*
1 Reply
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
NC vested as of 8/12/1989
As long as you rolled ALL of it into an IRA within 60days, then you indicate that on the pages that follow that 1099-R form and it won't be taxed.
Your bigger issue is that once rolled into an IRA, you can no longer claim "Bailey Settlement" for any $$ you take out of that account...you have lost the ability to claim that the $$ are qualified for exemption from NC taxes.
"qualifying tax-exempt Bailey benefits rolled over into another retirement plan lose their character and would not be exempt upon distribution from the other plan unless that plan is a qualifying Bailey retirement account in which the employee was vested as of August 12, 1989. (Rollovers to IRAs will always result in a loss of tax-exempt status since IRAs do not qualify under the Bailey settlement.)"
Your bigger issue is that once rolled into an IRA, you can no longer claim "Bailey Settlement" for any $$ you take out of that account...you have lost the ability to claim that the $$ are qualified for exemption from NC taxes.
"qualifying tax-exempt Bailey benefits rolled over into another retirement plan lose their character and would not be exempt upon distribution from the other plan unless that plan is a qualifying Bailey retirement account in which the employee was vested as of August 12, 1989. (Rollovers to IRAs will always result in a loss of tax-exempt status since IRAs do not qualify under the Bailey settlement.)"
____________*Answers are correct to the best of my knowledge when posted, but should not be considered to be legal or official tax advice.*
Still have questions?
Make a post
Or browse the Forums