1322229
We converted our personal use home to rental property in 2019. I think TurboTax is incorrectly computing depreciation. Assuming (hypothetical numbers) original cost of rental property in 2016 was $150000, with cost of land being $50000. Property was changed to rental use in May 2019. Basis for depreciation is $100000 (assuming it is lesser than fair market value in May 2019). As per IRS publication 527's table 2-2d (MACRS GDS percentage table for residential rental property), the percentage for depreciation for property placed in service in May 2019 is 2.273%. This means depreciation deduction is $2,273.
On top of this TurboTax is computing depreciation for percentage of days rental property was used for business in 2019. Business use percentage is 67.12% of days (245 days). Which means, depreciation deduction as per TurboTax is $2273*0.6712 = $1525.71.
Why is TurboTax using business use percentage when table 2-2d has already accounted for the same?
Thanks!
You'll need to sign in or create an account to connect with an expert.
It doesn't work that way. Your property was placed in service in May. From that point on, business use is 100%. Your personal use is done.
Normally depreciation is 3.636% for any given year. Because you placed it service part way through the year, you get a smaller percerntage.
Thanks Coleen for response. Does that mean I should force "Business Use Percentage" to 100% in TurboTax? As far as I know this field was automatically filled. I understand since the property is placed in service from May, we get smaller percentage, and this is what the IRS table pointed as well.
How did you initially answer the questions? You stated that it was converted from personal to business? Your business percent should not have been entered, you should have been able to put 100%. Personal days are zero.
I myself have found a few "disparities" with how TurboTax figures depreciation in certain and specific cases. Mainly dealing with when renting out a room in your primary residence. There are some situations where this "disparity" will carry over when converting an entire property to a rental. The program does the math correctly. However, the program doesn't provide the clarity that (in my personal opinion) I think it should on some screens. This commonly results in the program user entering incorrect data. So when the user enters incorrect data, that's what the program has to work with. The resulting depreciation figured will then be wrong.
Here's the guidance that will provide you the clarity necessary.
Date of Conversion - If this was your primary residence before, then this date is the day AFTER you moved out.
In Service Date - This is the date a renter "could" have moved in. Usually, this date is the day you put the FOR RENT sign in the front yard.
Number of days Rented - the day count for this starts from the first day a renter "could" have moved in. That should be your "in service" date if you were asked for that. Vacant periods between renters count also PROVIDED you did not live in the house for one single day during said period of vacancy.
Days of Personal Use - This number will be a big fat ZERO. Read the screen. It's asking for the number of days you lived in the property AFTER you converted it to a rental. I seriously doubt (though it is possible) that you lived in the house (or space, if renting a part of your home) as your primary residence or 2nd home, after you converted it to a rental.
Business Use Percentage. 100%. I'll put that in words so there's no doubt I didn't make a typo here. One Hundred Percent. After you converted this property or space to rental use, it was one hundred percent business use. What you used it for prior to the date of conversion doesn't count.
Still have questions?
Questions are answered within a few hours on average.
Post a Question*Must create login to post
Ask questions and learn more about your taxes and finances.
Kenn
Level 3
Aleriom
New Member
nirbhee
Level 3
fzmoda04
New Member
shehires
New Member