I recently got CP2000 in mail saying that I received income on securities ($30K worth), and have to pay $8.5K of additional taxes (including penalty and interest).
Securities listed on that CP2000 form is from my broker on some of stocks was sold that year. My company pays with 1/ Base salary and 2/ RSU stocks, which are vested during a year. My preference is to "sell enough to cover taxes during vesting", so that shares were sold at date I've acquired them to cover estimated taxes. Both: full cost of stares on vesting date and taxes paid for that amount was recored in form of paycheck and reflected on my W-2.
I forgot to include my 1099-B form with my tax return, which had this all transactions in it, and looks like "cost basis" was not reported to IRS which made it assume that it was 0, so this resulted in full cost of stocks being treated as income. My 1099-B shows that "Gross proceeds (Box 1d)" and "Cost Basis (Box 1e)" are almost equals and having couple cents difference (commission), so there was no gain on this shares.
So I plan to reply back to IRS that I do not agree with charges and include following supporting my case:
1. W-2, showing "<cost of all RSUs vested> RSU" in box 14-Other (to show that this vests has already been accounted for)
2. 1099-B from my broker, showing "Gross proceeds" and "Cost Basis" for all transactions.
3. Form 8949 with this transactions from 1099-B and Schedule D. (after rounding numbers up, I got "0" in total gain and on schedule D).
4. CP2000 response form (last pages), stating that I do not agree with changes and explaining same I wrote in this post.
They note in the letter that I do not need to send a 1040X and they will make any applicable corrections.
Will this be enough to resolve my case? Have I provided enough evidence? Will this reduce tax I owe, penalties and interest to 0, or I will still have to pay penalty for incorrect 1040 I initially sent?
You'll need to sign in or create an account to connect with an expert.
what you propose should do. I'm not sure that the w-2 is needed because the issue seems to be solely that the sale of the stock was not reported on your return but was reported to the IRS with no cost. therefore the 1099-B showing cost and the 8949 should be adequate with an explanation. it won't hurt to send the w-2.
what you propose should do. I'm not sure that the w-2 is needed because the issue seems to be solely that the sale of the stock was not reported on your return but was reported to the IRS with no cost. therefore the 1099-B showing cost and the 8949 should be adequate with an explanation. it won't hurt to send the w-2.
Other than you usually have a loss on the sales in the amount of the broker's fee the answer you posted is adequate.
Fees on this transactions for me was less than 50 cents on each transaction, so if I do rounding according to this https://www.irs.gov/instructions/i8949#idm[phone number removed]400 led me to "0" result
Still have questions?
Questions are answered within a few hours on average.
Post a Question*Must create login to post
Ask questions and learn more about your taxes and finances.
coolcoke2008
New Member
HermanandLillieLLC
New Member
Rockpowwer
Level 2
uncle-sam
Returning Member
jdwcaw
Level 2