turbotax icon
Announcements
Close icon
Do you have a TurboTax Online account?

We'll help you get started or pick up where you left off.

All Posts

The suggestion did not work entirely. I deleted all of my 1099-R's and reinserted them.  It reduced the amount of the penalty because Turbo Tax on its own computed that $105,000 was still not distrib... See more...
The suggestion did not work entirely. I deleted all of my 1099-R's and reinserted them.  It reduced the amount of the penalty because Turbo Tax on its own computed that $105,000 was still not distributed.  The program ignored my response that all of the RMD was distributed.    I now have to file a waiver with the truth that the Turbo Tax software has a bug that adds amounts to the RMD.    I am not sure how Turbo Tax got to that number as there is no way the program lets you find the source of the number (another flaw in the program), but I am left with explaining Turbo Tax's error through a waiver request.     Very frustrated.    
MelindaS1:  Unless the Form 1099-R was prepared improperly or the rollover was mishandled, a Form 1099-R that reports a distribution only part of which was rolled over cannot have code G in box 7 bec... See more...
MelindaS1:  Unless the Form 1099-R was prepared improperly or the rollover was mishandled, a Form 1099-R that reports a distribution only part of which was rolled over cannot have code G in box 7 because code G means that the entire gross amount was rolled over.  That combined with the details provided from the 1099-R Summary indicate that the distribution is therefore from a traditional account in an employer plan and that the rollover was an indirect rollover, so the Form 1099-R must have code 1, 2 or 7 in box 7.   frenzel:  The distribution consisted of $50,000 of pre-tax funds and $150,000 of after-tax funds.  (Presumably at least $5,000 of this distribution went to mandatory tax withholding.)  By operation of law, a rollover of $150,000 of that distribution consists of all $50,000 of the pre-tax funds and $100,000 of the after-tax funds, leaving $50,000 of after-tax funds not rolled over.  That's what the 1099-R Summary is telling you.  Because the entire $50,000 of the pre-tax funds was rolled over, the taxable amount of the distribution is $0.   Perhaps you desired that the portion rolled over consisted of the entire $150,000 of after-tax funds, leaving the $50,000 of pre-tax funds not rolled over and therefore taxable, but the tax code does not allow you to designate which portions are the ones rolled over.  As I mentioned, the tax code dictates that the first portion of the rollover comes from the otherwise taxable portion of the distribution, so in this case that portion becomes nontaxable due to having been rolled over.
I am experiencing the same issue voiced by others.  During the TurboTax interview, it immediately declares that I do not qualify as a real estate professional.  I believe the interview is assuming th... See more...
I am experiencing the same issue voiced by others.  During the TurboTax interview, it immediately declares that I do not qualify as a real estate professional.  I believe the interview is assuming that the high income from one spouse negates that the other is the real estate professional.  I have been using TurboTax for many years with these same properties and haven't had this issue.  The interview has changed, and I believe has incorrect logic.  What to do?  Anyway to go into the forms and fix this directly?  
Yes, this is helpful but let's be clear. People like myself use TurboTax because it walks us through these scenarios, helps up fill out the worksheets and helps determine what is or is not part of ou... See more...
Yes, this is helpful but let's be clear. People like myself use TurboTax because it walks us through these scenarios, helps up fill out the worksheets and helps determine what is or is not part of our income. The 1099-Q was sent to my daughter who is the beneficiary of the the 529 and is the recipient of that rollover.  When we walk through the step-by-step of TurboTax, it asks--Did you receive a 1099-Q? We answer YES. Then we fill information and answer the questions and the worksheet should through the responses we provide based on the QTP-to-Roth box and other responses, determine that the income should not be included.   We fill this information out in TurboTax so we ensure we do not miss anything and expect the tool to do the job we purchased it for to guide us to indicate that it is not necessary to list this as income. So while your are quoting proper information about taxes, and she could just avoid answering YES to the 1099-Q question, we would actually expect that TurboTax would allow her to answer this information so that I have a secondary record that shows that she answered and provided this information, that the tax check before filing will validate that there are no errors and she can submit her taxes knowing she has put this information into the worksheet, TurboTax validated that it was not considered income, and the information would be there if an audit were ever done (because then it would be there for the audit defense). What I am asking for is that Intuit get this addressed ASAP. It is a tool issue that needs to be resolved and should be resolved so that taxpayers using their tool do not have to kludge the information to get their taxes filed.
My experience with the online version was so bad that I aborted mid stream and reverted to my desktop as I have done for many years. I contacted TT asking how to abort an online return (not completed... See more...
My experience with the online version was so bad that I aborted mid stream and reverted to my desktop as I have done for many years. I contacted TT asking how to abort an online return (not completed or submitted). I was directed to JustAnswer who eventually helped me accomplish this (I think). I was told that I would not be charged even though I was required to sign up for a JustAnswer account. I attempted to follow all directions but I find that I have been charged $65 + $5 for this answer. JustAnswer says tough luck. As a long time TT user, I am very unhappy!
Hi, My previous company offered some performance related stock units to me which was vested in 2025. Assume the number of unit vested is 100, and they sold part of it (40 units) to pay tax and asked ... See more...
Hi, My previous company offered some performance related stock units to me which was vested in 2025. Assume the number of unit vested is 100, and they sold part of it (40 units) to pay tax and asked us to sign and filed 83(b). But these stock units have a feature that since I left the company before certain date/condition met, they took it back. However, even they took what was left after tax back, these units are shown as income on my W2 and the units they used to pay tax are also included, according to the company.   How should I report this as I have no tax related document to file directly on TurboTax?
How are my itemized deductions more than my standard deductions but turbo tax is using same amount for either option
If the file is elsewhere, using the "find the file" search allows browsing to the file's location, but selecting the file does not actually select any file. Copying the file to Documents enables tu... See more...
If the file is elsewhere, using the "find the file" search allows browsing to the file's location, but selecting the file does not actually select any file. Copying the file to Documents enables turobotaxTY2025 to find it. The file will open fine in TY2024 turbotax so the file is fine.
We sold rental property in 2025. We had adjustments to the cost basis to add in (improvements to the property) - I figured out how to do this manually on the Asset Entry Worksheet line 29 (Note to Tu... See more...
We sold rental property in 2025. We had adjustments to the cost basis to add in (improvements to the property) - I figured out how to do this manually on the Asset Entry Worksheet line 29 (Note to Turbotax: the instructions on the desktop premiere version for doing this with the interview refer to screens and questions that DO NOT EXIST in the software, you need to troubleshoot this!!). On the federal return, this seems to have worked: the cost basis was adjusted and the net profit/income went down accordingly. I also put the same amount (that is, the adjusted cost basis) on line 63-p of the same Asset Entry Worksheet, where the "State Depreciation" is calculated, so that the same adjusted basis would show up on the state form.   But: it doesn't. When I got to working on the state form and got to the interview section "Schedule of Gains/Losses" for this property, it autofills the original (unadjusted) cost basis - and the net profit/income is higher on the state return than on the federal return. State is PA, if that matters. Questions: 1) should this be corrected, or does the state not allow for an adjusted cost basis? 2) if it should be corrected - what's the best way to do that?  There is a box to check that says "This sale requires an adjustment to the basis of the asset"  but when I click on "Learn More" it tells me that this is for a "cost basis adjustment due to Pennsylvania non-conformity" - which is not the reason for our cost basis adjustment. Should this be manually corrected on the Asset Entry Worksheet, on line 63c? Or somewhere else? Thanks in advance for the help.   (FWIW I am very disappointed in the Premiere software - I thought paying more for the upgrade would get me more detailed assistance for the real estate transaction, but all I got was more confusion, mainly because the "extra help" button takes you to a description of  screens and interview sections that don't exist in the Desktop software.)
I made an  upgrade to my HVAC system that qualifieds for the Energy Efficient credits. I input the HVAC manufactures (Daikin) QMID  and cost of install. The next questions for Form 5965 ask about ena... See more...
I made an  upgrade to my HVAC system that qualifieds for the Energy Efficient credits. I input the HVAC manufactures (Daikin) QMID  and cost of install. The next questions for Form 5965 ask about enabling costs. It was necessary for me to install an electrical subpanel for this HVAC upgrade, however the electrical panel manufacturer (Eaton) did not submit the proper paperwork in time to qualify for a QMID. Should I be waiting to claim these credits in 2026 when the QMID may not be necessary to qualify? I have heard other people just throwing in a random QMID to get the credits and claiming that if audited they can show the expenses. I am jsut not sure what to do and this is the difference between me getting a refund or owing money.
And....make sure you are using only the first three characters of the Document ID ...it is NOT the DMV ID number.   ...depending on the license type...check the following pictures provided by NY: ... See more...
And....make sure you are using only the first three characters of the Document ID ...it is NOT the DMV ID number.   ...depending on the license type...check the following pictures provided by NY: Sample Photo Documents | NY DMV
need to setup a payment plan but the amount i owe is not showing up. I checked the tax documents and I see I owe X amount of money but i cant find it when i try to setup a payment plan
I added my husbands W2 after I had filled out the dependent credit section and it seems to have not updated when I added his $71,000 of income
I still cannot import financial data from TIAA, despite several hours of Turbotax help.  I get to "connected" but the "allow" button does not work so I can get no further.  I have tried disabling vir... See more...
I still cannot import financial data from TIAA, despite several hours of Turbotax help.  I get to "connected" but the "allow" button does not work so I can get no further.  I have tried disabling virus scans, got rid of cookies, changed LAN access to allow, changed browser from Chrome to Edge, checked with TIAA and there is nothing blocking on their side.  I cannot manually enter all the data I need to import, so I need Turbotax to fix this ASAP.
Para reclamar el reembolso que fue ocupado para curbrir la deuda de su conyuge, debe buscar el formulario 8379 con hacerle clic en icono de la lupa (cual esta ubicada en la parte superior derecha de ... See more...
Para reclamar el reembolso que fue ocupado para curbrir la deuda de su conyuge, debe buscar el formulario 8379 con hacerle clic en icono de la lupa (cual esta ubicada en la parte superior derecha de su pantalla, e ingresar, "formulario 8379" en la caja de busqueda.   Puede obtener mas informacion sobre este proceso en este enlace - ¿Cómo presento el Formulario 8379, Asignación del cónyuge perjudicado?   Siga las instrucciones cuidadosamente para que TurboTax pueda realizar los calculos necesarios y determinar que parte del reembolso le pertenese a usted.
The goal of entering the Form 1099-LTC is to show that the payment received and reported on the Form 1099-LTC was less than the total expenses.  That makes the payment tax-free.  Since the reimbursem... See more...
The goal of entering the Form 1099-LTC is to show that the payment received and reported on the Form 1099-LTC was less than the total expenses.  That makes the payment tax-free.  Since the reimbursement received covered days past the 100 day elimination period, you should report the number of days being reimbursed that does not include the first 100 days and the cost for those days that are reimbursed.   TurboTax will not transfer any of this information to the Medical Expenses section to be used as an itemized deduction.  You will need to calculate the cost incurred for the first 100 days plus any additional cost incurred and paid over and above the reimbursement amount for the days that were reimbursed by the LTC plan and enter this information as a medical expense.