Good morning, thank you for the opportunity to ask a question. I’m self-employed with around 90k yearly income. Is it a good idea to set up an LLC and pay myself a salary in a reasonable amount, and receive the rest of income through a distribution? Awaiting your response. Thank you!
You'll need to sign in or create an account to connect with an expert.
A single-member LLC is disregarded for federal income tax purposes; it is treated as a sole proprietorship unless an election is made to treat the LLC as a corporation.
As a result, your single-member LLC could not pay you a salary (again, unless an election was made to treat the LLC as a corporation).
A single-member LLC is disregarded for federal income tax purposes; it is treated as a sole proprietorship unless an election is made to treat the LLC as a corporation.
As a result, your single-member LLC could not pay you a salary (again, unless an election was made to treat the LLC as a corporation).
Thank you for the prompt response. My wife works with me so she can be an employee as well, will that qualify since it will be two employees now?
Even if you have a multi-member LLC, the default entity type is a partnership.
As such, members (partners) could only receive guaranteed payments, which are reported on their K-1s (not W-2s).
In other words, partners of a partnership and members of an LLC (under the default classification) cannot be employees of the entities of which they are partners/members.
Thank you
If I may, what would you suggest to do in order to deal with the self-employed tax, Social Security, etc. in a more efficient way in my case? Thank you again.
Still have questions?
Make a postAsk questions and learn more about your taxes and finances.
wagsyardsolution
New Member
kirbyfred
New Member
rickmjonesperez
New Member
laurie9916
New Member
s0u1ma7e
New Member
Did the information on this page answer your question?
You have clicked a link to a site outside of the TurboTax Community. By clicking "Continue", you will leave the Community and be taken to that site instead.