You'll need to sign in or create an account to connect with an expert.
can we go back to the original question as this is rather simple
$200,000 of personal property was lost in a fire. The insurance company paid $100,000 under the claim
whether or not the money is used to replace the destroyed items there are no tax consequences as long as what you paid for the personal property that was lost originally cost you at least $100,000. . It is a reimbursement from insurance and is not taxable.
The $100,000 that was NOT paid by the insurance company is not deductible as it's a personal loss which are no longer tax deductible
again, nothing about this situation will impact your tax filing
There is no casualty loss available under the new tax laws for personal use property.
Uncertain how this helped out middle american or created jobs.
https://www.mileiq.com/blog/how-changes-to-tax-law-affect-fire-and-casualty-loss-tax-deduction/
are you assuming that any change to the tax law is intended to help the middle class or create jobs?
aren't tax law changes number of 'puts and takes' (i.e. "compromises") to meet a political agenda?
wasn't the elimination of effectively all misc deductions a 'put', but there were other 'takes' that made up for it?
Still have questions?
Questions are answered within a few hours on average.
Post a Question*Must create login to post
Ask questions and learn more about your taxes and finances.
ItalnGrl_1975
Returning Member
user17671286960
Returning Member
spartanusm
New Member
overcurious
Level 1
AE_1989
New Member