in Events
I am an F-1 Ph.D. student in Illinois and I was coming from China. I am not in the US for more than five years so I am a non-resident for tax purposes. I married my wife in 2021 and she is a resident alien. So we elect to treat me, the nonresident spouse, as a resident alien for tax purposes and file a joint federal return (see IRS Nonresident Spouse). Based on the US-China tax treaty, I may still claim my tax treaty for specific items even if I am a nonresident alien electing to file a joint return, because I am still qualified for the exception stated in the saving clause to the tax treaty (see IRS Pub 519 Students, Apprentices, Trainees, Teachers, Professors, and Researchers Who Became Resident Aliens).
My university has reported my fellowship (with income code 16 and exemption code 04 for box 3a, and the tax rate is 0.00) and other $5000 (with income code 20 and exemption code 04 for box 3a, and the tax rate is 0.00) in two separate Form 1042-S to indicate that they are exempted from federal tax based on the US-China tax treaty.
May I know whether I can use this method and the method mentioned by @AmyC to report the income from my 1042-S in the Other Income as follows?
Second Option: I also notice other answers for reporting the 1042-S, where they are generally using other methods in TurboTax resulting in reporting the 1042-S income in line 1 Wages, salaries, tips, etc. Attach Form(s) W-2, and then enter the negative amount of all the 1042-S income on line 8 Other income from Schedule 1, line 10 such that the 1042-S income can be also offset to indicate they are exempt from tax treaty.
For this method and the method mentioned by @AmyC, and the Second Option, all of them have the same adjusted gross income (AGI) in line 11 of Form 1040. However, when we are filing the California state tax return on Schedule CA (540NR), for this method and the method mentioned by @AmyC, I know that I need to add back the tax treaty exemption amount in Part II, line 1, Column C because the CA do not recognize the tax treaty. By this method and the method mentioned by @AmyC, the tax treaty amount is exactly excluded in line 1 in federal Form 1040 since the tax treaty amount is all reported in line 8 in Federal Form 1040 as 0. So it is fine that we must add them back in Schedule CA Part II, line 1, Column C using TurboTax such that Column D can precisely and correctly show our total income without exempting the tax treaty amount from 1042-S.
However, for the Second Option, the tax treaty amount is directly reported in line 1 of federal Form 1040 and only be offset by the negative amount reported in line 8 of federal Form 1040. Since the Schedule CA (540NR) directly uses the number in line 1 of federal Form 1040 to fill in Schedule CA (540NR) Part II, line 1, Column A (Federal Amounts), then it means that the tax treaty exemption amount is not excluded in the Column A. If so, then should I still add the tax treaty exemption amount back in Part II, line 1, Column C in Schedule CA (540NR)? If I add the tax treaty exemption amount back in Column C, then Part II, line 1, Column D in Schedule CA (540NR) will be larger than the total amount of our income since the tax treaty exemption amount is being added twice in Schedule CA (540NR) Part II line 1, i.e., being reported in both line 1 Column A and C.
You'll need to sign in or create an account to connect with an expert.
Great job! It is nice for the 1042 to be reported in the area that matches the form but the end goal is to have the correct income being reported and taxed.
What matters is for you to be able to show in an audit that you filed the income and paid any taxes due. Both the federal and state taxing agencies want to see the income and correct tax. They understand the location may vary and will accept your records/ methods as long as the tax is correct. Your question shows you are trying to do the right thing.
You do not want to be double taxed so that is not an option. I like simplicity, as you saw in my posts: but, you choose the method that makes you comfortable.
@AmyC Thank you for your prompt reply! Yes, the reason I am asking these questions is that I have no idea whether there is an absolute right or wrong for your method and my mentioned Second Option, when both of them have the same AGI. For your method, it is comfortable when filing the CA state tax, while the Second Option will make me confused when filing the CA state tax. So I just ask them here. I think based on your answer, I may choose your method to avoid making things complicated 🙂
I am in a similar situation. I am a postdoctoral research fellow with a J-1 visa and I received a 1042-S form from Columbia University. As a Spanish citizen who has been here less than 5 years, I am aware of the existence of a Spanish tax treaty regarding the 1042-S, exempting me from Federal and state taxes. I was following the method described above ( @AmyC method), but I have some concerns:
- This approach doesn’t seem to include any details about the "employer"/withholding agent. Isn’t that information important when filing?
-My taxes withheld are $0 because my university already applied the treaty benefits. However, when I follow this method, the New York State return shows a refund of $63. How is that possible if I haven’t actually paid any state taxes?
1. The IRS is matching amounts on your tax return and the description of tax treaty or 1042S income let's them know where to look.
2. If your income has already been reduced, you would not reduce it again.
3. NY does offer some credits and the program might have you qualifying for one - where maybe you shouldn't.
Take a look at your tax forms. You want to repot the correct income on your federal and state forms. While looking, you can see what NY is giving you for a credit.
To print or view your forms, including all worksheets:
Still have questions?
Questions are answered within a few hours on average.
Post a Question*Must create login to post
Ask questions and learn more about your taxes and finances.
Raph
Community Manager
in Events
Raph
Community Manager
in Events
Raph
Community Manager
in Events
popomama1
Level 2
frankfei
New Member