Issue: The e-file validation script for the Section 225 Overtime Deduction (Schedule 1-A) is triggering a false-positive "Reasonableness" error by incorrectly using W-2 Box 1 as the denominator for its calculations instead of W-2 Box 3.
I spent nearly 2 hours on the phone today with technical support. I am not 100% confident this bug is being followed up on. My Diagnostic Token is: [removed]-96664364
Technical Details:
The Conflict: The software assumes a "Qualified Overtime Premium" cannot exceed 1/3 of total wages. My entry is exactly 1/3 of my Gross Wages (Box 3), but it appears as 46% of my Taxable Wages (Box 1).
The Root Cause: The validation logic fails to account for Box 12 pre-tax contributions (e.g., 403b/401k). These contributions "shrink" Box 1, creating a mathematical distortion that falsely flags a perfectly legal 1.5x overtime premium ratio.
The Impact: This error prevents e-filing for employees whose overtime work is significant and whose pre-tax retirement contributions are high, even when the data matches the W-2 perfectly.
Steps to Reproduce:
Enter a W-2 where 100% of the work is overtime (common for dual-role employees under the same EIN).
Include a significant pre-tax contribution in Box 12.
Attempt to claim the 33.3% overtime premium deduction on Schedule 1-A.
The software will block e-filing, citing that the overtime cannot be more than 1/3 of Box 1.
Thanks!
You'll need to sign in or create an account to connect with an expert.
Box 1 of the W-2 is the correct box to use when evaluating overtime. Box 3 is Social Security wages. However, I'd like to understand a couple of things.
Combine the two W-2's that are from the same EIN.
The IRS will recognise the two EINs as the same and do the same calculation.
This will resolve the 33,3% overtime issue.
Contact us again with any additional details.
Thank you for the response, but combining the W-2s is not a viable solution for several reasons:
Different EINs: These W-2s are from separate divisions within the same corporation and carry different Employer Identification Numbers (EINs). Combining them would cause an IRS mismatch error and is not an option.
Separate Capacities: One role is salaried (Standard Time), while the other is strictly hourly (100% Overtime). This is not a 'dual role' under a single payroll record; they are distinct entries.
The Root Mathematical Error Remains:
The issue isn't how the data is entered; it’s the denominator the validation script uses for the 'Reasonableness' check.
The Box 1 Distortion: Box 1 represents taxable wages after pre-tax contributions (401k/403b). For any employee who saves for retirement, Box 1 is significantly lower than their actual gross earnings.
The Logic Failure: By using Box 1 as the denominator, the software creates a false-positive error.
Example: Gross Wages (Box 5) = $100,000. Overtime = $33,333 (Exactly 1/3, which is legal).
The Savings Penalty: If that person contributes $23,000 to a 401k, their Box 1 becomes $77,000.
The Bug: TurboTax then calculates $33,333 \div 77,000 = 43.2\%.
The Result: The software blocks the e-file because $43.2\% > 33.3\%, even though the overtime is exactly 1/3 of the earned wages.
The Requested Fix:
This validation script should be updated to compare the Schedule 1-A entry against Box 5 (Medicare Wages), which represents true gross earnings and does not 'shrink' based on retirement contributions.
Please escalate this to the Product Integrity / Calculations Team. This bug effectively prevents any taxpayer with significant overtime and high retirement savings from e-filing.
I don't understand.
Still have questions?
Questions are answered within a few hours on average.
Post a Question*Must create login to post
Ask questions and learn more about your taxes and finances.
Hleocadio
New Member
HotToddy
New Member
user17731960146
New Member
Sportsguy
Level 2
user17712966181
New Member