turbotax icon
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
turbotax icon
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements
Close icon
Do you have a TurboTax Online account?

We'll help you get started or pick up where you left off.

Sam2717
New Member

I was labeled as a partner instead of a spouse on my wife’s work insurance

I got married in July and just found out this week that we were being charged double for insurance because I was labeled as a partner instead of a wife in her insurance. We were married on the 14th and as of the 17th we submitted the documents to show that we were married. They just never updated it on their side. Now, I don’t know what to do because it was $352 a month extra that they won’t give us back, and I don’t know if we can even get it back through our taxes. They say we can get it back but they keep changing up what they tell us everytime we call. 
They called it imputed income/taxes and I’ve looked into it some but can’t make sense of it. We shouldn’t have been labeled under it to begin with because we were married. 
Any help would be appreciated! 

x
Do you have an Intuit account?

Do you have an Intuit account?

You'll need to sign in or create an account to connect with an expert.

11 Replies

I was labeled as a partner instead of a spouse on my wife’s work insurance

There is no tax procedure to fix this.  There are some things you could attempt but they would be red flags for an audit, and I would not mess around with this problem unless you hire your own tax professional who will represent you if audited.

 

I think you need to go after the employer.  If you enrolled your spouse during the proper open enrollment period (or proper life event period) and with the correct documentation, I would think you have a legal claim against them if they don't fix the problem.  And they certainly can fix it, both on their tax filings and your W-2.  It's a bit complicated and if it is a small employer they might not want to bother, or if they are using a payroll company they might not want to argue with the payroll company.  And fixing this will save them money as well, so I don't understand why they won't fix it, as long as you submitted the proper documentation when you enrolled.  But they certainly can fix it if they want to.  If the company won't help, I would contact your state labor regulator.

 

Of course, if you anger your employer you might be out of a job.  That's a tough calculation to have to go through.  Fight, maybe get a lawyer, or try to backdoor it on your tax return and hire an accountant to help.

Sam2717
New Member

I was labeled as a partner instead of a spouse on my wife’s work insurance

We did submit it under a life event. When I called they said they would open a case and escalate it to corrections for my taxes, but I didn’t know if there was anything I could do. That took several calls to get them to even do that. They just kept telling me they don’t do refunds on overcharges and I would have to go through my taxes and the IRS 

Sam2717
New Member

I was labeled as a partner instead of a spouse on my wife’s work insurance

They did change us to spouses in their system

I was labeled as a partner instead of a spouse on my wife’s work insurance


@Sam2717 wrote:

They did change us to spouses in their system


At least you are correct going forward.

 

As far as the imputed income from July through the date of the correction, it is correctible.  It's a matter of whether they want to do the extra work.   

 

(Specifically, they probably can't correct the federal tax withholding, whatever was withheld was withheld.  Box 2 on your W-2.  But they can correct your box 1 taxable wages, and if the wages are lower, the excess withholding would result in a larger than normal tax refund.  They would also have to reduce your box 3 and 5 wages subject to medicare and social security tax, then reduce the box 3 and 5 withholding, and that would be refunded to you in cash rather than getting it back on your tax return. It's uncommon but it's doable.) 

 

It's mostly internal bookkeeping, but it's not a common issue and they might not know how to do it, or they might not want to put in the work.   That would leave you with correcting it via your tax return, for which I recommend hiring a pro to help, because you could get questioned by the IRS.  

Sam2717
New Member

I was labeled as a partner instead of a spouse on my wife’s work insurance

That’s just what I needed to know, thank you so much! 

I really appreciate it, I’ve been stressing about this for the last week. Now I have a direction to go in. Thank you! 

dmertz
Level 15

I was labeled as a partner instead of a spouse on my wife’s work insurance

With $352/month inappropriately taken out of the pay for health insurance and no correction made by the employer, the W-2 will show lower amounts in boxes 1, 2, 3 and 5 than would otherwise be the case.  Reported this way on the tax return, the lower box 1 amount would result in a lower tax liability, but the difference in tax liability wouldn't come close to making up for the fact that more of the pay went to health insurance than should have.  For example, if the marginal tax rate is 22% it would mean recovering only 22% plus 7.65% FICA via the reduction in tax liability.  The only proper correction would be for the employer to refund to you the excess amounts paid, withhold from that the additional amounts that should have been withheld for income, Social security and Medicare taxes, and issue a W-2 that reflects the corrections.  The employer would have to obtain from the health plan excess amounts they paid to the plan.  (Much easier for everyone involved if the employer makes the correction before year-end than to delay the correction until next year.)

I was labeled as a partner instead of a spouse on my wife’s work insurance


@dmertz wrote:

With $352/month inappropriately taken out of the pay for health insurance and no correction made by the employer, the W-2 will show lower amounts in boxes 1, 2, 3 and 5 than would otherwise be the case.  

 


 

That's not the only thing that happened.

 

In fact, two things should have happened.  

 

First, the employee share of the premiums for the domestic partner would have been deducted after-tax instead of pre-tax.  However, and probably more importantly, the employer share of the premiums for the DP would have been added to the employee's income as wages as imputed income, and been subject to federal, state and employment tax withholding.

 

How that would look on a weekly basis is harder to calculate and explain.  But when it gets to the W-2 stage, the net result would something like this:

 

Assume the contracted wages were $50,000 per year.  The employer share of premiums was $1000 per month ($500 for employee and $500 for partner), and the employee share was $500 ($250 for self and $250 for partner) per month.  The imputed wages are included for 6 months (July-December).

 

Under the correct calculation (the spouse is treated as a spouse),

Box 1 wages $47,000 Box 2 fed w/h $5000
Box 3 SS wages $47,000 Box 4 SS w/h $2914
Box 5 medicare wages $47,000 Box 6 Medicare w/h $681

 

This is because the employer premium is not imputed income and the employee premium is deductible.

 

Under the imputed income calculation, the W-2 should look something like this

Box 1 wages $51,500 Box 2 fed w/h $5200
Box 3 SS wages $51,500 Box 4 SS w/h $3193
Box 5 medicare wages $51,500 Box 6 Medicare w/h $746

 

The wages are higher because only the self-premium is deductible ($250/month, $1500 for the 6 months) and the employer premium is taxable imputed income ($500/month, $3000 for the 6 months).  In addition to this the other $250 employee share for the partner was taken out after tax, not before.

 

The insurance company got their $1500 per month either way, the issue is how it was taxed and deducted (or not) to the employee.

 

The employer can correct the W-2 to reflect that the extra employee share should have been pre-tax, and the employer share should not have been imputed income.  The W-2 withholding does not have to be refunded (because the taxpayer would get that back as their tax refund) but the employer should refund the corrected SS and Medicare withholding.   Like I said, it's permissible for the employer to do this and the calculation (and the procedure to adjust the SS and medicare withholding) are all possible, if they wanted to put in the effort.  

 

I'm not sure how you determined that $352/month was taken out inappropriately.  The employee share of the spouse premium would have to be paid anyway, it just would have come out before tax instead of after tax.  There was extra tax withholding (due to the imputed income and lack of tax deduction for the spouse premium), but whether that extra withholding accounts for the entire $352 would require a much more detailed analysis of the entire situation. 

dmertz
Level 15

I was labeled as a partner instead of a spouse on my wife’s work insurance

"the employee share of the premiums for the domestic partner would have been deducted after-tax instead of pre-tax."

 

I failed to consider that.  Yeah, that would mean that the tax consequences would make it worse, not better as I had thought.

I was labeled as a partner instead of a spouse on my wife’s work insurance

...and finally to point out, that even if the employer has to refund some money to the employee when they fix this problem, that money comes out of the employer's refund from the social security and Medicare tax, half of which goes to the employee and half to the employer.  So the employer actually saves money by fixing the issue. 

Sam2717
New Member

I was labeled as a partner instead of a spouse on my wife’s work insurance

The employer refuses to refund anything. They say it’s against policy. The best they say they can do it send it to corrections for tax purposes 

I was labeled as a partner instead of a spouse on my wife’s work insurance


@Sam2717 wrote:

The employer refuses to refund anything. They say it’s against policy. The best they say they can do it send it to corrections for tax purposes 


You will have to wait for your W-2, then, and if you think you need to make a manual correction on your tax return, I would suggest a tax professional. Plus, keep copies of all your documentation, communication with the employer, etc., in case your manual correction is audited.  

message box icon

Get more help

Ask questions and learn more about your taxes and finances.

Post your Question
Manage cookies