You'll need to sign in or create an account to connect with an expert.
This maybe too little too late, but upon death of the owner, the property gets a step-up in basis equal to its FMV at the date of death of the grantor of the trust. This effectively makes the cost basis the same as the sales price so there's no gain. You wouldn't use or need to use Section 121 to eliminate the capital gain because of this act of law.
What if the home deposited into the trust, and occupied by the depositor, can be removed (reacquired) from the trust by the depositor and replaced by replacing it with property of similar value? In that case, is the $250,000 preserved?
"Depositor" isn't a valid term. You mean Grantor, which, if deceased, can't do anything.
No I believe it wouldn't be a sham if, as a Trustee, you simply did the transactions through a 1031 exchange. No real way of "removing" it from the (now irrevocable) trust without considering it a sale, so just sell it and buy another ("replace") property within the 1031 time constraints.
The original question did not specify whether the trust was revocable or irrevocable. Thus, the reply only provides a partial answer to the question and is correct in stating that an irrevocable trust does not qualify for a Section 121 capital gains exclusion. However, if a house is held by a revocable trust and served as the principal residence for at least 2 out of the preceding 5 years as the tax filer’s (trust owner’s) principal residence, it fully qualifies for the Section 121 exclusion ($250,000 for single and $500,000 for married filing jointly). The grantors of a revocable trust are considered the owners of the property for Federal tax purposes.
Still have questions?
Questions are answered within a few hours on average.
Post a Question*Must create login to post
Ask questions and learn more about your taxes and finances.
mysmartloan19
New Member
wtpot
Level 1
Vermillionnnnn
Returning Member
vparker89
New Member
tommytrust1990
New Member