1160873
Rolled over my traditional 401k to my new employer's plan. Followed all directions, all's well; I can see that I am not be taxed on the distribution.
However, my return now shows a grossly distorted income due to the roll over showing as income. This may be of no technical consequence.... but it sort of bothers me.
When entering the roll over distribution info and amounts I was expecting an opportunity to show off-setting entries; that is, xxx-amount distribution from the previous IRA and the same xxx-amount shown as being rolled-over into the new IRA, with one entry washing out the other, so to speak
Did I miss a step?
Thanks
RTLL
You'll need to sign in or create an account to connect with an expert.
Yes, TurboTax includes the rollover as income even if it is not taxable- it is just the TurboTax treatment. I think it so you can make sure all income is entered, but I tend to agree it can be confusing and unnecessary- it does not affect any tax.
No, you did not miss a step. This is indeed considered under the tax code to be income even though it is nontaxable. It is required to appear on Form 1040 line 4c but has no other effect on your tax return or anything else because it is excluded from line 4d.
Thanks for the help!
RTLL
I understand what you say about it not being taxed, HOWEVER, because it shows up as income, the State (OR) is using it as income, and therefore expects me to pay back $13k for our Marketplace Insurance. Is this right?? Even though we reinvested ALL of it? Thank you!
The Oregon tax form starts with Federal Adjusted Gross Income, which does not include the amount of the distribution/rollover, so I don't see how Oregon would be using it to determine your eligibility for Marketplace insurance.
Still have questions?
Questions are answered within a few hours on average.
Post a Question*Must create login to post
Ask questions and learn more about your taxes and finances.
ajm2281
Returning Member
waynelandry1
Returning Member
Lukas1994
Level 2
jigga27
New Member
branmill799
New Member