turbotax icon
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Close icon
Do you have a TurboTax Online account?

We'll help you get started or pick up where you left off.

All Posts

You can probably fix this display issue by changing your zoom to not more than 100%.   You can also try clearing your cache and cookies. ‌Please click here for instructions on how to clear your c... See more...
You can probably fix this display issue by changing your zoom to not more than 100%.   You can also try clearing your cache and cookies. ‌Please click here for instructions on how to clear your cache. Please click here for instructions on clearing your cookies.   You can also try a different browser, such as Chrome or Firefox.
I am reporting what appears to be a calculation bug in TurboTax’s implementation of IRS Form 5695, specifically for lines 19a through 19h for energy‑efficient exterior doors.   Per the IRS Form 569... See more...
I am reporting what appears to be a calculation bug in TurboTax’s implementation of IRS Form 5695, specifically for lines 19a through 19h for energy‑efficient exterior doors.   Per the IRS Form 5695 instructions, the credit for qualifying exterior doors should work as follows: Line 19a: Cost of the most expensive qualifying door Line 19c: 30% of line 19a, capped at $250 Line 19d: Cost of the two next most expensive qualifying doors Line 19e: Cost of all other qualifying exterior doors Line 19f: Sum of lines 19d and 19e Line 19g: 30% of line 19f Line 19h: Sum of lines 19c and 19g, capped at $500 In my case, I have two qualifying exterior doors, each costing $2,795. TurboTax correctly populates: 19a = $2,795 19c = $250 (30% of 19a, capped at $250) 19d = $2,795 (second door) 19f = $2,795 (sum of 19d and 19e as shown on the form) However, TurboTax then fails to perform the required calculation on line 19g and does not compute the additional credit: Line 19g is left blank, even though the instructions say: “Multiply line 19f by 30% (0.30).” Line 19h remains at $250, even though it should be the sum of 19c and 19g, capped at $500. Based on the IRS instructions, with two qualifying doors, the correct result should be: 19g = $250 (30% of 19f, capped at $250) 19h = $500 (19c + 19g, capped at $500) I have attached a screenshot of the filled‑in Form 5695 from TurboTax showing: 19a = 2,795 19c = 250 19d = 2,795 19f = 2,795 19g = blank (should be 250) 19h = 250 (should be 500) This indicates that TurboTax is not applying the 30% calculation to line 19f and is therefore under‑calculating the allowed credit. Additionally: When I attempt to use line 19e (“all other qualifying exterior doors”) as a workaround, the correct credit is applied BUT, TurboTax Smart Check flags this as an error, insisting that the “second” and “third” door fields be used first. Because of this, I cannot use a manual workaround within the software without triggering errors. Using an “override” on the form is not an acceptable solution, because overrides prevent e‑filing. I need to e‑file my return, so I need TurboTax to perform the calculation correctly without overrides. Thank you for reviewing this. Can anyone tell if this was an update bug and if it will be fixed in the near future? I am aware that "overriding" the entry on the form section can allow me to proceed but this would not allow me to e-file my return. Furthermore, from what I have noticed from others, prior submitted returns have been getting rejected due to Form 5696 calculation errors. I would prefer to have Turbo Tax look into this and fix this "math bug."   I am using the TurboTax Deluxe Windows PC Desktop Version.  
Yes, you should be able to file your amended return.  One reason your return can't be efiled right now is that it might have a form that is not available for efiling right now.  State and federal for... See more...
Yes, you should be able to file your amended return.  One reason your return can't be efiled right now is that it might have a form that is not available for efiling right now.  State and federal forms are released on different dates.  You can visit the following TurboTax help article to see if any of your forms are currently unavailable.   When will my individual tax forms be available in TurboTax?   If all your forms are available and you can check some of our common solutions.  If your tax return can't be e-filed for some reason, TurboTax will let you know.   If your issue continues, contact us again and give us more details.       
If your Form 1095-A has entries only for January through September, be sure to leave the other months blank in TurboTax. TurboTax will not accept zeros on the form.   If your Form 1095-A has zero... See more...
If your Form 1095-A has entries only for January through September, be sure to leave the other months blank in TurboTax. TurboTax will not accept zeros on the form.   If your Form 1095-A has zeros for Column B, enter instead the second lowest cost Silver plan (SLCSP) premium amounts. To find the second lowest cost Silver plan premium amounts for you, use this tool at Healthcare.gov. The software won't accept zeros in Column B.   Please see this help article for more information on entering Form 1095-A information in TurboTax.   Please see this tax tips article for more information about the Premium Tax Credit. @dstautz1 
Minnesota 2025 Schedule M1SA Instructions, page 2 reports a Standard Deduction Table.   Married filing jointly with both spouses age 65 or older is reported as $33,000.
TurboTax has entered our Minnesota standard deduction for 2025 as $33,000.  This is the information I have found online about the amount for the Minnesota standard deduction. 2025 STANDARD DEDUCTION... See more...
TurboTax has entered our Minnesota standard deduction for 2025 as $33,000.  This is the information I have found online about the amount for the Minnesota standard deduction. 2025 STANDARD DEDUCTION AMOUNTS SINGLE $15,750  (65 or older/legally blind + $2000) MARRIED FILING SEPARATELY $15,750  (65 or older/legally blind +1600) MARRIED FILING JOINTLY $31,500  (65 or older/legally blind + $1600) HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD $23,625 (65 or older/legally blind + $2000) Based on the above information, the proper amount appears to be $31,500 + $1,600 + $1,600 = $34,700. I can't find any justification for the $33,000 number used by TurboTax. If this number is wrong, how can it be corrected?  If the TurboTax number is right, how was it computed?
1.  Does that mean you were a resident for 2024 ?  When did you enter this country with F-1 ? Was 2024 your first year filing as  Resident  ( form 1040 ? ). - I entered in 2019. Yes, 2024 was the fi... See more...
1.  Does that mean you were a resident for 2024 ?  When did you enter this country with F-1 ? Was 2024 your first year filing as  Resident  ( form 1040 ? ). - I entered in 2019. Yes, 2024 was the first year filling 1040. 2.  When did your wife enter the US with F-1 ?   - 2024. 3. When did you get married ? - 2024.9. 4.  When exactly  did your F-1 status get adjusted ? - 2025.10 5. Why/ how did you file MFJ ?  Did you consult a tax professional  or what ? - Just eligible for filing MFJ. Consulted chatgpt.
@MindyB  Is the March 13 date for online or desktop or both?
Bonjour, Donc si je comprends bien, j'achète et utilise turboimpôt (avant impôtrapide) version cd/téléchargement année après année depuis minimum 15 ans. L'an passé je suis trompé dans la version en... See more...
Bonjour, Donc si je comprends bien, j'achète et utilise turboimpôt (avant impôtrapide) version cd/téléchargement année après année depuis minimum 15 ans. L'an passé je suis trompé dans la version en achetant la version 'en ligne'. Malgré mon erreur, j'ai pu utiliser mon fichier .tt23 que j'avais dans mon ordinateur afin de produre mes rapports d'impôt 2024. Maintenant, j'ai porté une attention particulière à la version lors de mon achat pour bien acheté la version téléchargé (qui n'est pas plus cher, ni moins cher que la version en ligne) malgré l'augmentation de 5$ cette année comparativement à l'an passé. Je dois entrer manuellement mes informations personnelles, car il est impossible d'importer du web mon fichier de l'an !! Mais c'est super ça !! Vive la technologie !! En 2026, on est capable d'importer l'ensemble de nos données d'un appareil Apple à Samsung Android (compagnie rivales), mais impossible de faire la même chose avec une version web ou téléchargée d'un même logiciel qui porte le même nom, produit par la même compagnie et qui à la même utilitée. Super !!
Wait times vary based on demand but generally you will be matched to an expert the same day.     
It sounds like a question along the way in the interview may have triggered this.    The easiest way to do remove it is to delete the Form 4797. Go to Tax Tools on the left of your screen, then T... See more...
It sounds like a question along the way in the interview may have triggered this.    The easiest way to do remove it is to delete the Form 4797. Go to Tax Tools on the left of your screen, then Tools, then select Delete a form.  Choose the trash can next to 4797.
When asked what type investment you sold, select either "Other" or "Land (other investment purpose)" from the list.
If you have received a New York STAR credit check in 2025, it is considered a refund of property taxes. If you did not itemize deductions on your 2024 federal return, you generally do not have to rep... See more...
If you have received a New York STAR credit check in 2025, it is considered a refund of property taxes. If you did not itemize deductions on your 2024 federal return, you generally do not have to report the 2025 STAR check as taxable income on your federal return, even if you itemize in 2025. This is because it is not a recovery of a previously deducted amount.
Ok, it is unfortunate Turbotax does not let one do this adjustment.   Btw, how does one access Schedule 1 directly in Turbotax? I usually navigate through the menu Wages and Income, Deductions and ... See more...
Ok, it is unfortunate Turbotax does not let one do this adjustment.   Btw, how does one access Schedule 1 directly in Turbotax? I usually navigate through the menu Wages and Income, Deductions and Credits etc, don't access forms directly.
I am reporting what appears to be a calculation bug in TurboTax’s implementation of IRS Form 5695, specifically for lines 19a through 19h for energy‑efficient exterior doors.   Per the IRS Form 5... See more...
I am reporting what appears to be a calculation bug in TurboTax’s implementation of IRS Form 5695, specifically for lines 19a through 19h for energy‑efficient exterior doors.   Per the IRS Form 5695 instructions, the credit for qualifying exterior doors should work as follows: Line 19a: Cost of the most expensive qualifying door Line 19c: 30% of line 19a, capped at $250 Line 19d: Cost of the two next most expensive qualifying doors Line 19e: Cost of all other qualifying exterior doors Line 19f: Sum of lines 19d and 19e Line 19g: 30% of line 19f Line 19h: Sum of lines 19c and 19g, capped at $500 In my case, I have two qualifying exterior doors, each costing $2,795. TurboTax correctly populates: 19a = $2,795 19c = $250 (30% of 19a, capped at $250) 19d = $2,795 (second door) 19f = $2,795 (sum of 19d and 19e as shown on the form) However, TurboTax then fails to perform the required calculation on line 19g and does not compute the additional credit: Line 19g is left blank, even though the instructions say: “Multiply line 19f by 30% (0.30).” Line 19h remains at $250, even though it should be the sum of 19c and 19g, capped at $500. Based on the IRS instructions, with two qualifying doors, the correct result should be: 19g = $250 (30% of 19f, capped at $250) 19h = $500 (19c + 19g, capped at $500) I have attached a screenshot of the filled‑in Form 5695 from TurboTax showing: 19a = 2,795 19c = 250 19d = 2,795 19f = 2,795 19g = blank (should be 250) 19h = 250 (should be 500) This indicates that TurboTax is not applying the 30% calculation to line 19f and is therefore under‑calculating the allowed credit. Additionally: When I attempt to use line 19e (“all other qualifying exterior doors”) as a workaround, the correct credit is applied BUT, TurboTax Smart Check flags this as an error, insisting that the “second” and “third” door fields be used first. Because of this, I cannot use a manual workaround within the software without triggering errors. Using an “override” on the form is not an acceptable solution, because overrides prevent e‑filing. I need to e‑file my return, so I need TurboTax to perform the calculation correctly without overrides. Thank you for reviewing this. Can anyone tell if this was an update bug and if it will be fixed in the near future? I am aware that "overriding" the entry on the form section can allow me to proceed but this would not allow me to e-file my return. Furthermore, from what I have noticed from others, prior submitted returns have been getting rejected due to Form 5696 calculation errors. I would prefer to have Turbo Tax look into this and fix this "math bug."   I am using the TurboTax Deluxe Windows PC Desktop Version.  
We will have a member of your team look into the issue.     @mosch362