turbotax icon
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Close icon
Do you have a TurboTax Online account?

We'll help you get started or pick up where you left off.

All Posts

Can you help me file a rejected return from 2024?
Thank you for your reply @CatinaT1.   Thank you for pointing out that TT can provide other metrics that are useful such as Blended Tax Rate.   However, focusing specifically on the Effective Tax ... See more...
Thank you for your reply @CatinaT1.   Thank you for pointing out that TT can provide other metrics that are useful such as Blended Tax Rate.   However, focusing specifically on the Effective Tax Rate as it is presented on the tax return printout rendered by TurboTax, it appears to be incorrect based on how I think we agree it should be calculated.   Here is what you said about that:   “Effective tax rate is something Turbo Tax uses to help you see where you stand; to see which W-2 may be deficient in withholding the correct amount of Federal tax, etc.   It should be the tax divided by the total income, not the AGI. It is a number without any real value other than just to let you know when you earn $1, about x% is taxed.“   I agree that the standard definition of Effective Tax Rate is the (total) tax divided by the total income. But as it appears on the TT printout I referred to in my original post, it does not equal the total tax divided by the total income.   It is labeled on the printout as “Effective Tax Rate” but it appears to be incorrect based how I think we both agree it should be calculated.  In my case the Effective Tax Rate TT shows in this section is about 1.7 percentage points lower than the Effective Tax Rate calculated as shown in the image.   So what I am seeking is how the Effective Tax Rate given in the section in the image is calculated since it does not seem to be calculated according to the standard definition of Effective Tax Rate or the way you and I apparently agree it should be calculated.  Is it a bug or is there some other explanation?  That's what I am trying to find out.   Please see the image of the TT printout below to clarify what I am saying.  
you are correct.  most individual taxpayers can skip steps 2 and 5 because investment expenses aren't deductible as for tracking, apps even spreadsheets, can help with your gain/loss and remainin... See more...
you are correct.  most individual taxpayers can skip steps 2 and 5 because investment expenses aren't deductible as for tracking, apps even spreadsheets, can help with your gain/loss and remaining tax basis and units.     
on the agreement form for you to take out the $40 from the return, i put in my name then my husband's and his name is not accepted so i file
I actually went back to the payment page after a couple days and it let me through with direct deposit option. Maybe if you select pay by check, then wait a couple days and go back and change it to d... See more...
I actually went back to the payment page after a couple days and it let me through with direct deposit option. Maybe if you select pay by check, then wait a couple days and go back and change it to direct deposit it might work.
My son moved to Kansas last summer to begin work for a Kansas City, Missouri employer. It is his only employer for the year. Never a MO resident. He initially started working in MO office only.  The... See more...
My son moved to Kansas last summer to begin work for a Kansas City, Missouri employer. It is his only employer for the year. Never a MO resident. He initially started working in MO office only.  Then in the fall, he started to work remote some days (hybrid) in KS home and changed withholding to reflect that (from a new nonresident MO W-4A filed for 84% MO as remote days started).  The W2 Box 16 State Wages are based on the MO W-4A allocation which changed from initially 100% MO then to 84% MO in the fall.   How are “Missouri Sources” wages determined for MO-NRI form, Part B, Line A? From the W2 Box 16 State Wages only? Results are MO 89% of Box 1.   This income reflects changing the MO W-4A percentages in the fall with remote wages recorded as they were earned. Or from calculating percentage days {MO Days/Total Days Worked}*(Box 1 income)? Results are MO 88% of Box 1.  This results in a $500 lower income allocated to MO than what is listed in Box 16.   This is similar to the Kansas City tax formula which uses Remote Days Percentage applied to entire Box 1 income (so the KC tax form income doesn't match its KC W2 income either, but this is their formula). Does Missouri want to see Box 16 wages or does it want to see the percentage income based on percentage of days in MO.  I’m concerned something will be flagged between MO and Kansas City taxes if 2 different taxable incomes are used, but I'm also concerned that MO would target the return if Box 16 wages weren’t used?  Shouldn’t taxes be the time to reconcile the reporting/allocating of income? Or is the W-4A supposed to be completely accurate as to where the employee does remote days?
Hi, can any TurboTax moderators confirm if this Schedule 8 PDF error has any impact on my imminent NETFILE? ie. can I NETFILE without worrying about this causing a re-file. Thanks.
Here are the instructions:   https://ttlc.intuit.com/turbotax-support/en-us/help-article/uninstall-products/switch-turbotax-cd-download-turbotax-online/L4awg8jwG_US_en_US     I believe you'll ha... See more...
Here are the instructions:   https://ttlc.intuit.com/turbotax-support/en-us/help-article/uninstall-products/switch-turbotax-cd-download-turbotax-online/L4awg8jwG_US_en_US     I believe you'll have to contact Support in order to get a refund on the download software, though:   1-800-446-8848
@MyLord wrote: wokndadog: There is no reason to be upset or rude. M-MTax was just trying to help. IF you do not like his answer, then just ignore it and move on. These are all "free" advices, are... See more...
@MyLord wrote: wokndadog: There is no reason to be upset or rude. M-MTax was just trying to help. IF you do not like his answer, then just ignore it and move on. These are all "free" advices, aren't they? I actually am totally confounded by the entire thought process from these posts. I honestly don't get it:   Intuit made a decision not to support Windows 10 well before the desktop programs were released last year (sometime in November) and people are still railing on about it. The threats, diatribes, and general rants are not going to change any decision-maker's mind at Intuit so why bother? I'm also not sure why even a long-time user feels that Intuit owes them something for paying a whopping $50-$90 a year for software (I think I spend more than that at Starbucks in one month - does Starbucks owe me anything other than coffee?).    The thing is that H&R Block, while the interface differs, does support Windows 10 so these same people are not stuck with nothing if they want to use desktop (installed) software. TaxAct also supports Windows 10, for that matter. The irony here is that there are Merrill customers out there who have dumped H&R Block in favor of TurboTax because H&R Block decided not to support importing 1099s from Merrill (just because something changed and HRB didn't want to be bothered). 
YA ENVIE MI FEDERAL RETURN. COMO HAGO PARA ENVIAR EL DE GEORGIA Y SOUTH CAROLINA
I used turbo tax and filed MFJ 2026 for 2025. My 1040 shows no tax on my SS. I received a bill from IRS. I did not mark yes on living in foreign country. 
Disagree @fredherpel  for unmarried co-owners residence, the debt limits apply to each taxapayer, not to the property [Voss,116 AFTR 22d 2015-5529 (9th Cir. 2015)] the IRS announced that it will ... See more...
Disagree @fredherpel  for unmarried co-owners residence, the debt limits apply to each taxapayer, not to the property [Voss,116 AFTR 22d 2015-5529 (9th Cir. 2015)] the IRS announced that it will follow the Voss decision (AOD 2016-02)   summary of the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT The panel held that the debt limit provisions of 26 U.S.C. § 163(h)(3) apply on a per-taxpayer basis to unmarried coowners of a qualified residence.
I filed my federal taxes last night and they're accepted.  I can't find my file anywhere, though, and I need to amend a couple of things. Please help.  
I work for the federal government and my place of work changed partway through the year from ON to QC, so they issued 2 different T4s. The first one, from ON, includes the maximum CPP contribution an... See more...
I work for the federal government and my place of work changed partway through the year from ON to QC, so they issued 2 different T4s. The first one, from ON, includes the maximum CPP contribution and part of CPP2. After my place of work changed to QC, I paid the balance of my additional contribution to QPP2. So the QC T4 and its associated RL1 show a QPP2 contribution with no QPP contribution. This is not an error; it is exactly as it should be.   The software however treats it as an error and will not let me enter QPP2 without QPP. After a full hour on the phone with your tech support, I received this: "This is not a software issue, because if you have a 2nd contribution (box 16A/17A), you should logically have a 1st contribution (box 16/17). Technically, both amount should be on the same T4. If the last version of your T4 on your CRA My Account is not with box 16/17 and box 16A/17A on the same slip, we suggest you to contact CRA to see if you can combine both T4s together to have only 1 but with all the amount reflecting your tax year."   This demonstrates a troubling misunderstanding of the tax rules. And i cannot combine the two slips, because the province of work in box 10 is different. The software needs to be modified to allow for this situation. 
Turbox tax record 401k Direct Rollover to IRA 1099-R in 1040 5a with correct amount, and checked rollover box of in 4a with 0. leading to filing rejected. How can i fix this in turbotax?
This is definitely a software glitch. If you run "Visit All" under miscellaneous income, there is no option for "Did not have a PPP loan". It forces you to pick a year or back out. I 
Make sure you entered your expenses in the correct spot, where do you see the loss?   In your tax return, the loss appears on your Schedule C that TurboTax generates when you enter your self-employme... See more...
Make sure you entered your expenses in the correct spot, where do you see the loss?   In your tax return, the loss appears on your Schedule C that TurboTax generates when you enter your self-employment income or expenses.   Once you enter business expenses in TurboTax, TurboTax automatically transfer those expenses to Schedule C.     Also, see Schedule 1, Line 3 to see your total business income or loss amount.   This amount on Schedule 1 is transferred to Line 8 of your Form 1040 tax return.    On the income summary, business income and expenses are listed under Self-Employment income and expenses.   Where do I enter Schedule C income and expenses?       If you entered your business expenses as Job Expenses, delete the Form 2106 that was generated.    That section is for w-2 employees, not self-employed taxpayers.     How to delete forms in TurboTax Online    How to delete forms in TurboTax Desktop