3090941
Hello!
I am not sure if this is a Fidelity issue for 2023, I'm hoping someone has had the same and can assist.
My Fidelity import is the detailed Supplemental Info instead of the 1099B 'summary' of batches by date.
For this particular stock, I also have RSA's. I get the Cost basis for the RSA on this supplemental. For the remaining transactions this typically ties to the 1099B ST Reported to IRS once I exclude the RSA's.
My 'Not reported 1099B' of course typically does not tie due to the adj cost I have to enter.
This year for this stock, the Cost Basis on the Supplemental (in TT) is Higher by 12K, the Wash Sales by 9K, Net Loss by the (12K). I was able to find the day but not transaction for 3K difference in Wash per 1099B less is reported I have to assume certain portions in that day are allowed. Does that sound right, or should it be by specific transaction?
Total for all transactions per the Supplemental - Proceeds tie, Cost Basis Higher by 12K, Wash Sales 9K, Net Gain is Less by the (3K).
My other main question is, why would these differ this year and do I need to make TT match the 'Reported to IRS' 1099B or leave it with the supplemental info that imported?
You'll need to sign in or create an account to connect with an expert.
Struggling with similar scenario.
TT import of Fidelity takes Wash Info from Supplemental Info -- not from 1099-B.
While it prompts for Adjusted Basis (correct 1099-B), it does NOT prompt to correct Wash Sale Disallow from 1099-B.
It also contradicts itself in asking to verify "exact" match to 1099, while failing to import the 1099-B wash sale data (and rather taking it from the supplemental information).
Assuming it's a TT BUG. Might drop TT after so many years.
Still have questions?
Questions are answered within a few hours on average.
Post a Question*Must create login to post
Ask questions and learn more about your taxes and finances.
user17531923050
New Member
vfluaitt001
Level 1
user17519246213
New Member
Smeg
Returning Member
jaganra92
New Member