I bought a house to flip in 2014. Things dragged on and I still own it. I put part of the house in service as a rental in 2019 so I am adding the property for 2019. The 2014 tax valuation of the land was $26,500 and of the building was $95,900. I paid $22,800 for the entire thing. Of course for that price the building was unlivable and in reality somewhat worthless. I put $140,000 in it and $10,000 in refi costs partway through. I entered the tax value of the land as $26,500 but what do I put for the value of the building? Do I put $0 or the $95,900 town tax value or the $140,000 I put in it? I am thinking the refi costs and cost to get it livable would be entered under assets and get depreciated. Thank you for any help you can give me.
You'll need to sign in or create an account to connect with an expert.
The 2014 tax valuation of the land was $26,500 and of the building was $95,900.
Understand that the tax valuation are "NEVER" used on the tax return. The sole purpose of the tax valuation is to determine what percentage of the price you paid, gets allocated to the land. Period. That's it. Nothing else.
So with a total tax valuation of $122,440, only 22% of that was allocated to the land.
Therefore, with your *ORIGINAL* purchase price of $22,800, 22% of that is $5,016 for the land. That leaves $17.784 for the structure. So in the COST box you'll enter $22,800 and for "Cost of Land" enter $5,016.
For that initial entry *DO* *NOT* add or include your property improvements. The program will *NOT* do the math correctly for allocating land value. Add your property improvements as physically separate entries do they only add value to the structure, without affecting the land value.
You'll do a second asset entry for your property improvements with a "cost" of $140,000 and for "cost of land" you'll enter a ZERO.
This will give you the correct totals of $5,016 for the land, and $157,784 for the structure. ($140,000 plus the $17,784 of the original structure value)
I am thinking the refi costs and cost to get it livable would be entered under assets and get depreciated.
Overall so far, your total cost basis is $162,800 with $157,784 total for the structure and $5,016 for the land.
Now you said you put "part of the house" in service as a rental in 2019. Elaborate with details please. There is a possibility that your situation will cause the program to figure depreciation incorrectly and it will "NOT" generate an error. But it's still wrong all the same.
As for your refi costs, none of your refi costs gets depreciated. They get amortized and deducted over the life of the loan. Here's how that works.
- Cost associated with acquisition of the property are added to the cost basis and depreciated along with the property, over 27.5 years. Your refi doesn't have any property acquisition costs. (But the original loan to purchase does.)
- Cost associated with acquisition of the loan are amortized (not capitalized) and deducted (not depreciated) over the life of the loan. These are the only costs you will have associated with your refi.
THANK YOU for your quick response. I understand your answer. In reply to your request for detail, the house in question is a large single family home and in the long term shall remain so. I finished enough of the house to rent out most of the first floor while the upstairs was sectioned off. When I finish the second floor this year it will still be a single family home only with more square footage. I plan to put the house on the market as soon as it is ready.
I have another question. Should I post this separately? My husband and I file Married Filing Separately because he wants nothing whatsoever to do with my rental properties including tax filing. I also have a part time job. I spent much of my year dealing (actively participating) with a different property that is a 2 family rental and lost about $25,000. Yes, $25,000. It doesn't make a difference if I check off QBI or not, it doesn't let me take the loss other than a small portion of the loss off setting a small profit in 2 other buildings. I spent >750 hours dealing with this property but not 750 hours each with all 4 properties. Even though I Actively Participate in all of them, I don't Materially Participate in all 4 separately. Is there an option to have this loss qualify for a partial refund perhaps through a "Safe Harbor"? I went to an accountant to ask questions but she wasn't that familiar with the new Safe Harbors. Thank you for your time.
@Landlady J wrote:I spent >750 hours dealing with this property but not 750 hours each with all 4 properties. Even though I Actively Participate in all of them, I don't Materially Participate in all 4 separately. Is there an option to have this loss qualify for a partial refund perhaps through a "Safe Harbor"? I went to an accountant to ask questions but she wasn't that familiar with the new Safe Harbors. Thank you for your time.
There is no "Safe Harbor" in connection with allowing Passive Losses like that.
However, are you SURE you don't "Materially Participate" in the property? You may want to review that.
https://www.irs.gov/publications/p925#en_US_2019_publink[phone number removed]
Still have questions?
Questions are answered within a few hours on average.
Post a Question*Must create login to post
Ask questions and learn more about your taxes and finances.
dcandresen
New Member
jenniferlfarrell
New Member
stixoffire2
Level 3
sarahliz-jensen23
New Member
CharlesJohnsontxstateedu
Returning Member