Yes, the at-risk loss would be the same number. In the tax world, "at risk" simply means that the owner is personally liable for the losses. If you do not have any funds that you are not responsible for such as a gift, then you are at-risk for your investment in this rental property. It's very rare where a person is not completely liable for their investment, such as a mortgage that is a lien against the property you own.
@aka51
**Say "Thanks" by clicking the thumb icon in a post
**Mark the post that answers your question by clicking on "Mark as Best Answer"
