Investors & landlords

@M-MTax We'll just have to disagree on the boilerplate nature of the adjustment power. I see it in every trust and even if not it is the trust, it is probably a default power in state law. These clauses make it clear the trustee can make such allocations even in a without an express adjustment power statute or with some more flexibility (the statues require the adoption of the prudent investor standard). See, e.g. https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/14/118/03324

That it is a boilerplate provisions does not, of course, somehow less it's grant of authority absent a more specific clause.

Finally @fordescort12 my point is that usually there is more specific grant of discretionary (or mandatory authority) to make distributions.  Or a statement about the purpose of the trust (to favor current benes or remainder benes?) To use the adjust power you must evaluate whether to do the adjustment based on how it affects the different classes of benes (see e.g. the above VT link and factors in (b)(1)-(9), (c), probably document and inform all benes (at least in your required accountings).

As I wrote before with examples usually there is a very clear power in a different section for the trustee to make discretionary distributions, perhaps with broad adjectives to less possible court review ("absolute discretion" -- still have to act in good faith, but harder for an unhappy bene to challenge). Or to make mandatory distributions.

If you don't have any other language and you have legal advice to use the adjustment power when doing the taxes and your trust accounting, then do so. I still maintain the drafting attorney should have done better. It is the attorney's job #1 job to make the intent of the trust creator as clear as possible. This is not clear in my opinion. I'm not saying you can't do it, just that this question would have never come up if the trust instrument had been written more clearly.