- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Investors & landlords
The answers to your questions are prepared in sequence to better assist you.
Replacement Property 1:
- The following will show whether confirmed:
- Yes, you should apportion the original land value to all of the current properties.
- Your formula seems like an accurate apportionment for the land.
- Same as number 2. above.
- I concur with this because there is no building on this property.
- I would consider that part of the $118,000 is land for the oil & gas property since it was part of the trade.
- Same as number 6. above.
- You will not be able to enter an asset for only land in the oil & gas property. This will be a paper record until the day you sell it or trade it.
- Mark each property as purchased and not traded.
Replacement Properties 2 & 3.
- The following show whether confirmed:
- Correct - Apportion the original land value between all three properties
- Correct - The original building is apportioned between the buildings 2 & 3.
- Exception - See 5. above
- Exception - See 5. above
- Once you decide a portion of the $118,000 is land you can use your formula to arrive at the amount for each property 1, 2, & 3.
- Yes, you are entering the buildings accurately in the asset section.
**Say "Thanks" by clicking the thumb icon in a post
**Mark the post that answers your question by clicking on "Mark as Best Answer"
**Mark the post that answers your question by clicking on "Mark as Best Answer"
March 22, 2023
7:22 AM