@AmeliesUncle wrote:
But my original point was that if they were nowhere near the Safe Harbor criteria, it would likely be a REALLY 'hard sell' to claim they meet the facts-and-circumstances.
I absolutely agree with that statement.
Nevertheless, I still question the inability to meet the safe harbor minimum based upon the facts stated in the posts. With more than one rental property and handling all of the management functions, tenant services, leases, hiring (and perhaps supervising) contractors, et al., I would think 250/yr would not be a reach.
