@re2boys you are aiming at wrong person. In response, Federal regulations do very much discuss LLC v. SMLLC for community property states and in the latter case give explicit direction that a single member LLC being a "disregarded entitiy" (including the odd case of married partners in community property states) have option to file as Sole Proprietors (two, both), but otherwise all other married couples and anyone else in a multi-member LLC must file Partnership 1065, and I have never said anything but that!
Furthermore, I have explicitly pointed out that the Schedule F goes with the 1065 (or were it the case of Sole Proprietor which it is not here - also goes with 1040~) So not sure why you are citing me!
As far as the dialog goes, it was and is always the OP who introduced the issue of avoiding 1065 thinking a married couple in general could do so. as to who told him Schedule F was not available in whatever case - well you can track that down in the dialog, I really don't know and don't care because whoever said it is wrong.
If this posted response is useful to you, please click on the upraised hand in the lower left of this post. Thank you. Scruffy Curmudgeon--PFFM/ IAFF, retired FireFighter/Paramedic - Locals 718/30, Veteran USAR O3 AIS/ASA '65-'67
NOT INTUIT EMPLOYEE
USAR 64-67 AIS/ASA MOS 9301 - O3
- Just donating my time
**Say Thanks by clicking the thumb icon in the lower left corner -it means nothing but makes those than answer feel wanted.
