@JFW3 I agree that the trust rules matter here ( how it is exactly worded --- this could be treated as a case of equitable ownership ( think there was case in California where Person A lived in the house , paid all the dues as if he owns the place, He had person B buy the house for him because he could not qualify for the loan. It was always understood that B was owner on paper but the house was for benefit / use of Person A. I brought this because of this -- can he claim to be the equitable owner ?
