@sriramganesan , having read through last few pages of comments / posts in this thread , I can across one of your own posts and I see that while I understand your frustration ( in having follow the software's "convoluted" path rather than just jump into the form 4797 and and schedule-D, 8939 etc. etc. ), you have not provided the details of the situation / scenario so one of us can help you solve the current problem at hand. I quite agree that from a single user perspective , trying to solve his/her one problem, it seems quite overwhelming, complicated and may even be un-necessarily convoluted ---- but from the software designer/ coder perspective, he/she is trying solve a class of problems , with many nooks and crannies, in the most efficient way . I am not trying to justify the product but just pointing out that the problems may be more complicated than appears to the individual user. Could they have done better ( the designer that is ) ,--- probably.
In any case could you PLEASE provide more context to your issue and perhaps one of us can help you and perhaps even suggest changes for future -- so you don't suffer the same frustration year after year. Please would you help ?
I will indeed circle back once I hear from you
pk
