- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Deductions & credits
When you say sec 6114 waives the requirement in your case, I assume you mean the regulation 26 CFR § 301.6114-1(b) as the statute doesn't have any waivers in it.
If you are covered under a waiver in the reg then I you may be good. See below. The regulation is very authoritative if it clearly applies to you.
How confident you need to be is, in and of itself, not a simple matter. Take a look at
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/2018ntf-what-is-your-authority-for-that.pdf
slide 7+ ("Reduction of the Understatement") ... part of the complexity is that you need to understand if you are taking an "undisclosed position" or if you are disclosing. If you filed the 8833 I'd say you were certainly disclosing. But if there is an exception, then is noting the treaty deduction on the return as you suggest sufficient? I don't know. It might not be because the IRS can't really read all such comments unless a human being audits the return. That's what the 8833 is for -- putting the IRS on notice and their computers can look out for 8833's that look suspicious.
This table is from a 2007 article so it might be outdated but you get the idea. Taxpayers are held to a lesser standard than professionals are. https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/issues/2007/oct/accountingforuncertainty.html
Exhibit 1
|
Tax Reporting Inclusion Thresholds |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
**Mark the post that answers your question by clicking on "Mark as Best Answer"