Sorry, that was kind of a cynical hypothetical where I forgot about occupancy. So basically if a married couple as a couple does not meet the 2 year frequency between sales then the adorable exclusion is based on meeting the two year frequency as an individual and more a married couple, which would still allow me 250k even though my wife did used hers and her name was on both homes???
I am not sure I understand your last statement regarding the rental.
