I received a Schedule K-1 in 3/2017 for an inheritance I received in 9/2016. It turns out that the estate had an annuity resulting in a considerable amount of income in 2016 of which I am paying a share per the Schedule K-1. This increased my taxes owned to Feds and state about $5K and $2K, respectively, and triggered penalties of $10 and $35, respectively. It does not seem fair that I should be penalized for unexpected beneficiary income on this Schedule K-1. I was reading that I could have avoided this by paying 100% of estimated taxes paid in 2015, but I do not pay an estimate and instead have additional money taken from my salary per a W-4. I noticed that I made slightly less in 2016 vs. 2015, so consequently, my taxes would have been less. Is this where I went wrong? How could I have avoided the penalties?
You'll need to sign in or create an account to connect with an expert.
If you have a bone to pick, it is with the executor of the estate who failed to make it clear to you when you were given the money in 9/2016 that this would be taxable income to you on your 2016 tax return. Whenever one receives an unexpected windfall, it's prudent to understand whether it is income that is taxable to you and then to determine if you must adjust your regular tax withholding or make an estimated tax payment to avoid an underpayment penalty. It's just the way the US tax system works. See IRS Tax Topic 306: https://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc306.html
Making less in 2016 that in 2015 may have actually decreased your underpayment penalty since one of the safe harbors depends on your previous year's tax liability.
If you have a bone to pick, it is with the executor of the estate who failed to make it clear to you when you were given the money in 9/2016 that this would be taxable income to you on your 2016 tax return. Whenever one receives an unexpected windfall, it's prudent to understand whether it is income that is taxable to you and then to determine if you must adjust your regular tax withholding or make an estimated tax payment to avoid an underpayment penalty. It's just the way the US tax system works. See IRS Tax Topic 306: https://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc306.html
Making less in 2016 that in 2015 may have actually decreased your underpayment penalty since one of the safe harbors depends on your previous year's tax liability.
Still have questions?
Make a postAsk questions and learn more about your taxes and finances.
riogrande
New Member
margiewashaba
New Member
jsstubbe
New Member
jack-donna
New Member
jack-donna
New Member
Did the information on this page answer your question?
You have clicked a link to a site outside of the TurboTax Community. By clicking "Continue", you will leave the Community and be taken to that site instead.