You'll need to sign in or create an account to connect with an expert.
It would be deductible if you were the real or equitable owner of the property.
Depending on the facts and circumstances, you might be able to make the argument that you are a beneficial owner, but that's a difficult argument to make. For example, see this discussion on the TaxAlmanac site: http://www.taxalmanac.org/index.php/Equitable_or_Beneficial_Ownership
Another example is Blanton (TCM 1998-211). The US Tax Court denied the Sec. 121 gain exclusion because there was no equitable ownership. In the case, the Tax Court found that there was no risk of loss if the property was damaged, they couldn’t rent out the property, and had no legal title. Simply put, Equitable Ownership is difficult to support.
It would be deductible if you were the real or equitable owner of the property.
Depending on the facts and circumstances, you might be able to make the argument that you are a beneficial owner, but that's a difficult argument to make. For example, see this discussion on the TaxAlmanac site: http://www.taxalmanac.org/index.php/Equitable_or_Beneficial_Ownership
Another example is Blanton (TCM 1998-211). The US Tax Court denied the Sec. 121 gain exclusion because there was no equitable ownership. In the case, the Tax Court found that there was no risk of loss if the property was damaged, they couldn’t rent out the property, and had no legal title. Simply put, Equitable Ownership is difficult to support.
Still have questions?
Questions are answered within a few hours on average.
Post a Question*Must create login to post
Ask questions and learn more about your taxes and finances.
WhatsTheDeal
Returning Member
dwaynesquestions
New Member
Mdschwartz1
New Member
ginab
New Member
heidimcn58
New Member