In late 2025, I did a Backdoor Roth where I contributed a non-deductible $8,000 to a Traditional IRA and then converted $8,002 to a Roth IRA a few days later, where the $2 difference reflects the interest gained between the dates I contributed and converted. In early March 2026, Turbo Tax told me that I was ineligible to contribute to a Traditional IRA because I had $0 in earned income. At the end of March, I submitted a Return of Excess Contribution Form with my brokerage firm, and they withdrew the original $8,000 plus $1,125 in net investment attributable (NIA) from my Roth IRA. In Turbo Tax, I created a mock 1099-R to reflect the return of excess contribution and the NIA for my 2025 taxes. Do I still submit my original 1099-R to reflect the original $8,000 contribution and $2 gain for my 2025 taxes? Thank you!
You'll need to sign in or create an account to connect with an expert.
You'll need to omit the Form 1099-R that reports the Roth conversion. The explanation statement that you provide for the return of contribution must include that the Roth conversion was a failed conversion due to having been made with funds that were not eligible for conversion.
With everything entered correctly, the $1,125 should be included on Form 1040 line 4b and nothing should be present on Form 8606.
In may previous post I assumed that a code-JP 2026 Form 1099-R from the IRA custodian will show $9,125 in box 1 and $1,125 in box 2a. If it actually shows only $1,123 in box 2a (just he gains while in the Roth IRA), it would be necessary to report the original Form 1099-R so that the $2 gets taxed. Either way, $1,125 needs to appear on Form 1040 line 4b.
Thank you dmertz. Based on a previous conversation with my IRA custodian, I created a mock 1099-R with:
However, I just called them again, and they that the $1,125 reflects the gain on $8,000 starting from the date I converted to a Roth IRA (not the date I contributed to a Traditional IRA) to the date I withdrew my excess contribution last week. So, the $1,125 doesn’t seem to include the $2 gain from my original backdoor Roth. Currently, my original 1099-R is still in Turbo Tax and the result of having both 1099-R’s is that my 1040 looks like:
Turbo Tax also created a 4852 and an 8606 and I tried to explain what happened in the 1040 4a Explanation Statement. Does having two 1099-R’s in this case sound right? And does a 1040 4a = $17,127 and 4b = $1,127 seem ok, too?
"the $1,125 reflects the gain on $8,000 starting from the date I converted to a Roth IRA (not the date I contributed to a Traditional IRA) "
You converted $8,002, not $8,000, so that would be a gain of $1,123 on $8,002. In that case, my second suggestion makes more sense: Show a conversion of $8,002 with $8,000 of basis, then show a return of the $8,002 failed conversion plus $1,123 of gains by changing box 2a of the code-JP 2026 Form 1099-R to $1,123. That way you get the correct amount of $1,125 on line 4b.
Do not enter the code-JP Form 1099-R as a substitute form. This from is not missing or incorrect, it just won't be issued until next year. Enter it as if you have already received the actual form. Entering as a Form 4852 will block you from e-filing.
[Edit]
... or maybe in this case you do need to enter it as a substitute form, otherwise I don't see how you can include an explanation.
So, I converted $8,002, but when I called my IRA custodian again today to ask for more details about how they did the withdrawal of excess contribution transaction, they said that they only took out $8,000 plus $1,125 in gain calculated off of a base of $8,000. When I asked why they didn’t take out $8,002, they said they weren’t able to take out more than I was eligible to contribute which was a max of $8,000. If they had actually taken out $8,002, I think the gain would have been slightly higher than $1,125.
Because of how my IRA custodian said that the withdrawal of excess contribution had to be done, I believe that when I get my actual 2026 1099-R, it will show $9,125 in box 1 and $1,125 in box 2a. I’m concerned that if I enter anything other than that on my substitute 1099-R with code JP 2026, it might cause a mismatch when I get my actual 1099-R next year and be “flagged” by the IRS? Also, does code JP 2026 still make sense because when I get my actual 1099-R next year and ignore it, then the IRS will know I’m ignoring it because I already entered it and explained it this year, like you mentioned in your note?
And, Turbo Tax says I am blocked from e-filing my state taxes (which I don’t know if I can get around), though TT says I can still e-file for federal.
What do you think? Thanks so much for your help!
"When I asked why they didn’t take out $8,002, they said they weren’t able to take out more than I was eligible to contribute which was a max of $8,000."
There is no such limitation. The limitation is that you can't request to be returned an amount greater than the amount actually contributed. In this case, because it was a failed conversion, the $8,002 deposited into the Roth IRA constituted an ordinary contribution of $8,002. Had a return of $8,002 been made, the attributable gain would still have been $1,125. (The $8,002 distribution from the traditional IRA corrected the excess in the traditional IRA.)
That said, I don't think that I would worry about the difference. Yeah, $2 of excess contribution remains in your the Roth IRA, but 6% of $2 is zero when rounded so there is effectively no penalty. If you truly want to correct this remaining excess, you can take an ordinary, nontaxable distribution of $2 from your Roth IRA.
If I was going to report this scenario on my own tax return, I would probably enter an $8,000 traditional IRA contribution, then indicate that I had that $8,000 contribution returned accompanied by $2 of attributable gain, entering a substitute code-8 Form 1099-R for the one that reports the conversion. I would then enter an $8,002 ordinary Roth IRA contribution and indicate that I had $8,000 of that returned accompanied by $1,125 of attributable gain, reported on a code-JP 2026 Form 1099-R, leaving an excess Roth IRA contribution of $2 on Form 5329. That would complete the 2025 tax return, showing $1,127 of taxable income on line 4b of Form 1040. I would then take an ordinary $2 Roth IRA distribution and report that on my 2026 tax return, including reporting it on line 20 of the 2026 Form 5329 to be subtracted from the $2 on line 18. But I'm probably being pedantic.
The way you have reported it is also reasonable because it too results in $1,127 on line 4b of Form 1040. Although I might consider adding a $2 ordinary Roth IRA contribution to account for the $2 excess that remains in the Roth IRA, that's probably unnecessary because the remaining $2 excess would probably be considered to be de minimis. Even if not reported as an excess contribution, you could still obtain an ordinary $2 Roth IRA distribution in 2026 to truly eliminate it.
Thank you for laying out my options.
Still have questions?
Questions are answered within a few hours on average.
Post a Question*Must create login to post
Ask questions and learn more about your taxes and finances.
RayZ2
Level 2
vg101
New Member
turbotaxisterrible
Returning Member
kiwi_jonnyboy
New Member
wgjohnston49
New Member