<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic I was enrolled in a 401(k) for part of 2016, and am no longer enrolled. Can I deduct contributions to a traditional IRA for the time where I was not enrolled in a 401(k)? in Retirement tax questions</title>
    <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/i-was-enrolled-in-a-401-k-for-part-of-2016-and-am-no-longer-enrolled-can-i-deduct-contributions-to-a/01/584363#M54839</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 23:00:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pnetco</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-05T23:00:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>I was enrolled in a 401(k) for part of 2016, and am no longer enrolled. Can I deduct contributions to a traditional IRA for the time where I was not enrolled in a 401(k)?</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/i-was-enrolled-in-a-401-k-for-part-of-2016-and-am-no-longer-enrolled-can-i-deduct-contributions-to-a/01/584363#M54839</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 23:00:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/i-was-enrolled-in-a-401-k-for-part-of-2016-and-am-no-longer-enrolled-can-i-deduct-contributions-to-a/01/584363#M54839</guid>
      <dc:creator>pnetco</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-05T23:00:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No.  Even if you were covered for one day, you are consid...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/no-even-if-you-were-covered-for-one-day-you-are-consid/01/584366#M54840</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;No&lt;/B&gt;. &amp;nbsp;Even if you were covered for one day, you are considered covered for the whole year. &amp;nbsp;However, this doesn't mean that no contributions are deductible; it means that the income thresholds are lower.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These links provide the most recent income limits for deducting IRAs, and includes situations when one spouse is covered but the other is not:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.irs.gov/retirement-plans/plan-participant-employee/2016-ira-contribution-and-deduction-limits-effect-of-modified-agi-on-deductible-contributions-if-you-are-covered-by-a-retirement-plan-at-work" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;IRA deductibility - covered by employer plan&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;(the "retirement plan" box on your W2 is checked)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.irs.gov/retirement-plans/plan-participant-employee/2016-ira-contribution-and-deduction-limits-effect-of-modified-agi-on-deductible-contributions-if-you-are-not-covered-by-a-retirement-plan-at-work" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;IRA deductibility - NOT covered by employer plan&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;(the "retirement plan" box on your W2 is NOT checked)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 23:00:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/no-even-if-you-were-covered-for-one-day-you-are-consid/01/584366#M54840</guid>
      <dc:creator>KenH1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-05T23:00:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

