<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Multiple IRAs and Pro Rata Rule in Retirement tax questions</title>
    <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/multiple-iras-and-pro-rata-rule/01/3553389#M240315</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi.&amp;nbsp; I'm seeing very conflicting information online about the legality of setting up multiple IRAs with pre-tax and after-tax dollars in them to avoid the pro-rata rule.&amp;nbsp; Doesn't the rule require that all IRAs, even if they are in different accounts and possibly with different providers, be included in the pro-rata calculation for determining taxability of backdoor Roth conversions?&amp;nbsp; A financial advisor (CFP) is recommending that having pre-tax and after-tax IRAs (separate accounts) allows one to ONLY convert the after-tax amounts without having to do a pro-rata calculation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2025 19:01:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ccea</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-03-09T19:01:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple IRAs and Pro Rata Rule</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/multiple-iras-and-pro-rata-rule/01/3553389#M240315</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi.&amp;nbsp; I'm seeing very conflicting information online about the legality of setting up multiple IRAs with pre-tax and after-tax dollars in them to avoid the pro-rata rule.&amp;nbsp; Doesn't the rule require that all IRAs, even if they are in different accounts and possibly with different providers, be included in the pro-rata calculation for determining taxability of backdoor Roth conversions?&amp;nbsp; A financial advisor (CFP) is recommending that having pre-tax and after-tax IRAs (separate accounts) allows one to ONLY convert the after-tax amounts without having to do a pro-rata calculation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2025 19:01:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/multiple-iras-and-pro-rata-rule/01/3553389#M240315</guid>
      <dc:creator>ccea</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-09T19:01:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple IRAs and Pro Rata Rule</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/re-multiple-iras-and-pro-rata-rule/01/3553823#M240352</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:14px;"&gt;Yes, in the eyes of the IRA all traditional/SEP/SIMPLE IRAs are one account. Therefore, the pro-rata rule would still apply.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.irs.gov/instructions/i8606#en_US_2023_publink25399ed0e1366" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:14px;"&gt;Line 6 Form 8606 instructions&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:14px;"&gt; state: "Enter the total value of &lt;STRONG&gt;all&lt;/STRONG&gt; your traditional, traditional SEP, and traditional SIMPLE IRAs as of December 31, 2024, plus any outstanding rollovers."&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:14px;"&gt;The Backdoor Roth only works if your traditional/SEP/SIMPLE IRAs don't have any pre-tax funds. If you plan to use this strategy in the future you might want to think about a reverse rollover where you rollover IRA money to a company plan, like a 401(k). Only pre-tax funds can be rolled from an IRA to a company plan. Therefore, you would isolate the basis and could start the Backdoor Roth procedure fresh. But it only works if your employer allows it, not all plans do.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2025 21:01:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/re-multiple-iras-and-pro-rata-rule/01/3553823#M240352</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanaB27</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-09T21:01:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple IRAs and Pro Rata Rule</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/re-multiple-iras-and-pro-rata-rule/01/3554040#M240371</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You should refer your CPA to Line 6 of Form 8606.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do not rely on haphazard misinformation on the Internet.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2025 22:01:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/re-multiple-iras-and-pro-rata-rule/01/3554040#M240371</guid>
      <dc:creator>fanfare</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-09T22:01:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple IRAs and Pro Rata Rule</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/re-multiple-iras-and-pro-rata-rule/01/3554733#M240470</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As you surmised, the CFP is wrong.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 02:08:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/re-multiple-iras-and-pro-rata-rule/01/3554733#M240470</guid>
      <dc:creator>dmertz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-10T02:08:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

