<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic 1099 distribution code G -- inviting too much IRS scrutiny in Retirement tax questions</title>
    <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/1099-distribution-code-g-inviting-too-much-irs-scrutiny/01/3320495#M221333</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I rolled over my 401K this year and it makes my IRA, 401K, Pension distributions lines jump up significantly.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;It's a 1099 -R with a distribution 7 code of G.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; It does show a 2a taxable amount of $0.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;However, my sense is the optics of that Retirement section with the new significant $$ (on top of my military retirement $$) provides the optics that would seem to trigger an audit.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Am I being paranoid?&amp;nbsp; should I not list the 1099-R - G code to avoid uncommon scrutiny?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 08:24:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tomc63</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-02-11T08:24:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>1099 distribution code G -- inviting too much IRS scrutiny</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/1099-distribution-code-g-inviting-too-much-irs-scrutiny/01/3320495#M221333</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I rolled over my 401K this year and it makes my IRA, 401K, Pension distributions lines jump up significantly.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;It's a 1099 -R with a distribution 7 code of G.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; It does show a 2a taxable amount of $0.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;However, my sense is the optics of that Retirement section with the new significant $$ (on top of my military retirement $$) provides the optics that would seem to trigger an audit.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Am I being paranoid?&amp;nbsp; should I not list the 1099-R - G code to avoid uncommon scrutiny?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 08:24:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/1099-distribution-code-g-inviting-too-much-irs-scrutiny/01/3320495#M221333</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tomc63</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-11T08:24:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 1099 distribution code G -- inviting too much IRS scrutiny</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/re-1099-distribution-code-g-inviting-too-much-irs-scrutiny/01/3320572#M221342</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You should list the 1099-R with code G which is a non taxable direct rollover.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This isn't at all a red flag for the IRS. Every year, thousands of taxpayers roll over their retirement plans, and the IRS is very familiar with these operations. You shouldn't worry at all!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 18:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/re-1099-distribution-code-g-inviting-too-much-irs-scrutiny/01/3320572#M221342</guid>
      <dc:creator>MinhT1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-11T18:04:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 1099 distribution code G -- inviting too much IRS scrutiny</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/re-1099-distribution-code-g-inviting-too-much-irs-scrutiny/01/3320581#M221343</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;thank you!!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 18:06:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/re-1099-distribution-code-g-inviting-too-much-irs-scrutiny/01/3320581#M221343</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tomc63</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-11T18:06:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

