<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic W is a resident of CA, H is a resident of NV, W receives a pension: Is H CA taxable on 50% of the pension on 540-NR as CA source; or is that 50% exempt under 4 US 114? in Retirement tax questions</title>
    <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/w-is-a-resident-of-ca-h-is-a-resident-of-nv-w-receives-a-pension-is-h-ca-taxable-on-50-of-the/01/3126628#M206237</link>
    <description>W earned pension benefit exclusively from CA work and all is community property.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Alternatively, would CA require W to include 50% of H's pension payments in NV or would it too be exempt from CA tax under 4 USC 114?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Are pension payments different than CA wages which are allocated 50% to W and H as CA source income and are 100% taxable in CA.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Basically, are pension payments treated as CA sourced wages because of W's residency or are they treated as sourced to the two different states since H and W both have a 50% community property right in the pension?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I cannot find an answer to this.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Thank You.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 10:10:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jdeangelis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-02-10T10:10:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>W is a resident of CA, H is a resident of NV, W receives a pension: Is H CA taxable on 50% of the pension on 540-NR as CA source; or is that 50% exempt under 4 US 114?</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/w-is-a-resident-of-ca-h-is-a-resident-of-nv-w-receives-a-pension-is-h-ca-taxable-on-50-of-the/01/3126628#M206237</link>
      <description>W earned pension benefit exclusively from CA work and all is community property.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Alternatively, would CA require W to include 50% of H's pension payments in NV or would it too be exempt from CA tax under 4 USC 114?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Are pension payments different than CA wages which are allocated 50% to W and H as CA source income and are 100% taxable in CA.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Basically, are pension payments treated as CA sourced wages because of W's residency or are they treated as sourced to the two different states since H and W both have a 50% community property right in the pension?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I cannot find an answer to this.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Thank You.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 10:10:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/w-is-a-resident-of-ca-h-is-a-resident-of-nv-w-receives-a-pension-is-h-ca-taxable-on-50-of-the/01/3126628#M206237</guid>
      <dc:creator>jdeangelis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-10T10:10:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: W is a resident of CA, H is a resident of NV, W receives a pension: Is H CA taxable on 50% of...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/re-w-is-a-resident-of-ca-h-is-a-resident-of-nv-w-receives-a-pension-is-h-ca-taxable-on-50-of/01/3131822#M206646</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Generally, &lt;I&gt;pension income is taxable in your Resident State&lt;/I&gt;, no matter what state you lived in when you earned it. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;H &amp;amp; W would not be filing a joint state return, as they are residents of different states.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;W would report 50% of H's pension income on their California return (community income).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Since H's pension is not considered '&lt;I&gt;CA source income&lt;/I&gt;', they would not need to file a CA return, unless they have other California income to report.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here's more detailed info from CA FTB on &lt;A href="https://www.ftb.ca.gov/file/personal/filing-status/married-rdp-filing-separately.html" target="_blank"&gt;RDP Filing Requirements.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2024 00:07:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/re-w-is-a-resident-of-ca-h-is-a-resident-of-nv-w-receives-a-pension-is-h-ca-taxable-on-50-of/01/3131822#M206646</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarilynG1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-17T00:07:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: W is a resident of CA, H is a resident of NV, W receives a pension: Is H CA taxable on 50% of the pension on 540-NR as CA source; or is that 50% exempt under 4 US 114?</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/re-w-is-a-resident-of-ca-h-is-a-resident-of-nv-w-receives-a-pension-is-h-ca-taxable-on-50-of-the/01/3131883#M206651</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you. &amp;nbsp;The pension is paid to W in CA; H receives 50% in NV as community property; a joint 540-NR is required because H has CA source wages and H and W file a joint federal return. &amp;nbsp;Should be same result: 50% allocated to H and 50% to W; W is taxed in CA on 50% of pension, and H is not taxed in CA on his 50% community property share. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2024 00:56:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/retirement/discussion/re-w-is-a-resident-of-ca-h-is-a-resident-of-nv-w-receives-a-pension-is-h-ca-taxable-on-50-of-the/01/3131883#M206651</guid>
      <dc:creator>jdeangelis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-17T00:56:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

