<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic K-1 shows loss. Cost basis=0,so can't deduct, but no indication of that in TurboTax &amp;quot;Schedule K1 At Risk Allocation Worksheet&amp;quot;. Can I put carry-over loss here to benefit? in Investors &amp; landlords</title>
    <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/k-1-shows-loss-cost-basis-0-so-can-t-deduct-but-no-indication-of-that-in-turbotax-schedule-k1-at/01/716846#M31810</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 14:43:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mfam</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-06T14:43:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>K-1 shows loss. Cost basis=0,so can't deduct, but no indication of that in TurboTax "Schedule K1 At Risk Allocation Worksheet". Can I put carry-over loss here to benefit?</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/k-1-shows-loss-cost-basis-0-so-can-t-deduct-but-no-indication-of-that-in-turbotax-schedule-k1-at/01/716846#M31810</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 14:43:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/k-1-shows-loss-cost-basis-0-so-can-t-deduct-but-no-indication-of-that-in-turbotax-schedule-k1-at/01/716846#M31810</guid>
      <dc:creator>mfam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-06T14:43:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Not understanding your comment "cost basis = 0". Are you...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/not-understanding-your-comment-cost-basis-0-are-you/01/716851#M31812</link>
      <description>Not understanding your comment "cost basis = 0".&lt;BR /&gt;Are you saying you have no tax basis in this entity?&lt;BR /&gt;Are you active or passive in the activity?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 14:43:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/not-understanding-your-comment-cost-basis-0-are-you/01/716851#M31812</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick19744</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-06T14:43:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yes, no basis and active.  If I follow TurboTax instructi...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/yes-no-basis-and-active-if-i-follow-turbotax-instructi/01/716857#M31814</link>
      <description>Yes, no basis and active.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;If I follow TurboTax instructions and put accumulated carry forward losses in the box shown in the image, my tax liability for 2017 decreases.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Doesn't seem correct.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Is it simply a matter of TurboTax not putting a proper qualifying statement on the Easy Step process (or whatever it is called)?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 14:43:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/yes-no-basis-and-active-if-i-follow-turbotax-instructi/01/716857#M31814</guid>
      <dc:creator>mfam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-06T14:43:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The problem is that you have checked the box that you are...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/the-problem-is-that-you-have-checked-the-box-that-you-are/01/716861#M31815</link>
      <description>The problem is that you have checked the box that you are at-risk.&lt;BR /&gt;This means that you have tax basis and your losses are allowed.&lt;BR /&gt;As such, that is why when you include the loss it will decrease your tax liability.&lt;BR /&gt;You need to uncheck the "at-risk" question box.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 14:43:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/the-problem-is-that-you-have-checked-the-box-that-you-are/01/716861#M31815</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick19744</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-06T14:43:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rick, The software does work as you suggest, but shouldn'...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/rick-the-software-does-work-as-you-suggest-but-shouldn/01/716863#M31816</link>
      <description>Rick,&lt;BR /&gt;The software does work as you suggest, but shouldn't there be a question to ask how much of my carry-forward losses are at-risk?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Why would it assume that my cost-basis equals or exceeds the carry-forward?&lt;BR /&gt;I'm not comfortable yet.&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you,&lt;BR /&gt;Dave</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 14:43:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/rick-the-software-does-work-as-you-suggest-but-shouldn/01/716863#M31816</guid>
      <dc:creator>mfam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-06T14:43:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>These more complicated issues are difficult to address wi...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/these-more-complicated-issues-are-difficult-to-address-wi/01/716870#M31817</link>
      <description>These more complicated issues are difficult to address without being face to face and looking at what you are seeing.&lt;BR /&gt;Based on your facts and comments, carryover losses and tax basis go hand in hand.&lt;BR /&gt;Having said that, you have indicated that you have no tax basis.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;If that is the case, your carryover losses are not deductible.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;So if they are not deductible, then you need to "uncheck" the at-risk box as noted earlier and you will not get any tax benefit.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;This is the correct handling based on the at-risk rules (no skin in the game then no deduction on the tax return).&lt;BR /&gt;Based on what you are presenting in your facts and responses, I believe the software is handling the situation correctly.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 14:43:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/these-more-complicated-issues-are-difficult-to-address-wi/01/716870#M31817</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick19744</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-06T14:43:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Say my carry forward losses were $100K.  If during 2017 I...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/say-my-carry-forward-losses-were-100k-if-during-2017-i/01/716877#M31818</link>
      <description>Say my carry forward losses were $100K.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;If during 2017 I added $1 of investment in the company, my cost basis is $1 and I have at-risk 'skin in the game', right?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;This form then removes all of my tax 2017 liability due to that $1.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Doesn't seem right.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 14:43:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/say-my-carry-forward-losses-were-100k-if-during-2017-i/01/716877#M31818</guid>
      <dc:creator>mfam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-06T14:43:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Maybe my mis-understanding is that the entry on the form...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/maybe-my-mis-understanding-is-that-the-entry-on-the-form/01/716883#M31819</link>
      <description>Maybe my mis-understanding is that the entry on the form for the carry over loss is entitled "Carryover Prior Year Loss", but what is meant is "At-Risk Carryover Prior Year Loss".&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Form doesn't want to know what I am carrying over as a loss, it wants that portion that is covered by my current cost-basis.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 14:43:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/maybe-my-mis-understanding-is-that-the-entry-on-the-form/01/716883#M31819</guid>
      <dc:creator>mfam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-06T14:43:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If your carryover losses are $100k and you add $1, then y...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/if-your-carryover-losses-are-100k-and-you-add-1-then-y/01/716884#M31820</link>
      <description>If your carryover losses are $100k and you add $1, then you are at-risk for this $1 and only the $1.&lt;BR /&gt;When you check the box that you are at-risk, then you are telling TT that you have sufficient at-risk (basis) to absorb all $100k; the language says "all of my investment is at-risk".&lt;BR /&gt;You being active, cannot have "at-risk carryover loss" as for you they are mutually exclusive.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;You would have carryover loss due to at-risk limitations (no at-risk).&lt;BR /&gt;TT is asking you exactly what needs to be asked "what portion of the carryover loss is covered by basis / at-risk".&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;That is all you are entitled to deduct.&lt;BR /&gt;By way of example: Suppose you have $100k carryover loss due to no basis / at-risk.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Your K-1 reflects $50,000 of current year income.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;You are entitled to use $50,000 of the carryover since you are now at-risk for that $50,000.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;This will net to zero taxable income and you will also now have zero basis with $50k carryover loss.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 14:43:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/if-your-carryover-losses-are-100k-and-you-add-1-then-y/01/716884#M31820</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick19744</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-06T14:43:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>@mfam   The official response from Product Quality is tha...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/mfam-the-official-response-from-product-quality-is-tha/01/716887#M31821</link>
      <description>&lt;A href="https://ttlc.intuit.com/users/b133b725-ddcd-4a71-a77c-3d77bc93cd00" target="_blank"&gt;@mfam&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The official response from Product Quality is that "we don't support a loss greater than the basis" and "it is something we don't support".&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;In other words, they say you can't use TurboTax in your situation.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://ttlc.intuit.com/users/60d6a0dc-821d-438c-a27a-571398115cb0" target="_blank"&gt;@Rick19744&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;See our prior discussion on this.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;You advocated the "At Risk" was an acceptable way to go (at least for an S-corporation), but I disagreed:&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="&lt;A href="https://ttlc.intuit.com/discussions/lounge/4128104-k-1-problem&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://ttlc.intuit.com/discussions/lounge/4128104-k-1-problem&amp;lt;/a" target="_blank"&gt;https://ttlc.intuit.com/discussions/lounge/4128104-k-1-problem"&amp;gt;https://ttlc.intuit.com/discussions/lounge/4128104-k-1-problem&amp;lt;/a&lt;/A&gt;&amp;gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 14:43:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/mfam-the-official-response-from-product-quality-is-tha/01/716887#M31821</guid>
      <dc:creator>TaxGuyBill</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-06T14:43:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Not sure the relevancy here.  The OP is indicating that t...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/not-sure-the-relevancy-here-the-op-is-indicating-that-t/01/716891#M31822</link>
      <description>Not sure the relevancy here.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The OP is indicating that they have no basis.&lt;BR /&gt;What were you disagreeing with in the previous post?&lt;BR /&gt;In most of these contexts basis and at-risk will be used interchangeably.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Especially in an S corp context.&lt;BR /&gt;Where this becomes more "technical" is in the partnership arena, but most will correlate at-risk and basis as one and the same.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;If you are at-risk you have basis to take losses.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 14:43:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/not-sure-the-relevancy-here-the-op-is-indicating-that-t/01/716891#M31822</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick19744</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-06T14:43:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: These more complicated issues are difficult to address wi...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/re-these-more-complicated-issues-are-difficult-to-address-wi/01/1423748#M49306</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have used TurboTax for 14 years but it can't handle K-1 forms (which I just received). I did not check that I was at risk and yet the software insists on giving me a huge deduction, which should be ZERO. There is no way to over ride TurboTax's error. I am defeated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2020 04:10:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/re-these-more-complicated-issues-are-difficult-to-address-wi/01/1423748#M49306</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeastman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-08T04:10:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: @mfam   The official response from Product Quality is tha...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/re-mfam-the-official-response-from-product-quality-is-tha/01/2778790#M93095</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/_95"&gt;@TaxGuyBill&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;I noticed your comment pertaining to my issues here&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/taxes/discussion/re-s-corp-dissallowed-loss-carryforw[product key removed]ation/01/2778763" target="_blank"&gt;https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/taxes/discussion/re-s-corp-dissallowed-loss-carryforw[product key removed]ation/01/2778763&lt;/A&gt; , perhaps you have some insights or comments? Would you say it is simple unfeasible to use TT in my situation (Similar to OP). Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2022 02:48:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/re-mfam-the-official-response-from-product-quality-is-tha/01/2778790#M93095</guid>
      <dc:creator>comboardq</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-07T02:48:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

