<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Live in building w 3 rental units.  Removed OLD asbestos insulation from boiler pipes.  Didnt replace ins. $2850 total.  75% for rentals is $2138.  Repair or cap expense? in Investors &amp; landlords</title>
    <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/live-in-building-w-3-rental-units-removed-old-asbestos-insulation-from-boiler-pipes-didnt-replace/01/673524#M29586</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 10:35:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jivefive99</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-06T10:35:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Live in building w 3 rental units.  Removed OLD asbestos insulation from boiler pipes.  Didnt replace ins. $2850 total.  75% for rentals is $2138.  Repair or cap expense?</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/live-in-building-w-3-rental-units-removed-old-asbestos-insulation-from-boiler-pipes-didnt-replace/01/673524#M29586</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 10:35:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/live-in-building-w-3-rental-units-removed-old-asbestos-insulation-from-boiler-pipes-didnt-replace/01/673524#M29586</guid>
      <dc:creator>jivefive99</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-06T10:35:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Service issued Letter Ruling (TAM) 9240004, which hel...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/the-service-issued-letter-ruling-tam-9240004-which-hel/01/673530#M29587</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The Service issued Letter Ruling (TAM) 9240004, which held that asbestos removal costs are not deductible as ordinary repairs and maintenance, but instead must be treated as capital expenditures.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 10:35:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/the-service-issued-letter-ruling-tam-9240004-which-hel/01/673530#M29587</guid>
      <dc:creator>view2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-06T10:35:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

