<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic I had Restricted Stock Grants vest. Fidelity sold off a certain % of them to cover ~$7k taxes, then I sold them. Now TT says I owe $7k more. What's wrong? in Investors &amp; landlords</title>
    <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/i-had-restricted-stock-grants-vest-fidelity-sold-off-a-certain-of-them-to-cover-7k-taxes-then-i-sold/01/399349#M16210</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I had Restricted Stock Grants vest in 2018. When that happened, Fidelity sold off a certain percentage of them to cover ~$7k worth of income taxes. A short while after that, I entered into a trade to sell the remaining stock, and got cash. My W2 clearly shows more than I earned, and I believe it includes the value of that transaction. I received a very confusing 1099-B from Fidelity that says "Short-term transactions for which basis is NOT reported to IRS...". When going through TurboTax, I added that amount ~$17k - to the 1099-B form. Now I somehow owe $7k in taxes, even though I claim 0 and single, and I have never owed before. I feel like I am doing something wrong. Does it sound right that I would end up owing that much or am I being double-taxed for something I already paid taxes on?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 19:53:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MR-SC</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-04T19:53:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>I had Restricted Stock Grants vest. Fidelity sold off a certain % of them to cover ~$7k taxes, then I sold them. Now TT says I owe $7k more. What's wrong?</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/i-had-restricted-stock-grants-vest-fidelity-sold-off-a-certain-of-them-to-cover-7k-taxes-then-i-sold/01/399349#M16210</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I had Restricted Stock Grants vest in 2018. When that happened, Fidelity sold off a certain percentage of them to cover ~$7k worth of income taxes. A short while after that, I entered into a trade to sell the remaining stock, and got cash. My W2 clearly shows more than I earned, and I believe it includes the value of that transaction. I received a very confusing 1099-B from Fidelity that says "Short-term transactions for which basis is NOT reported to IRS...". When going through TurboTax, I added that amount ~$17k - to the 1099-B form. Now I somehow owe $7k in taxes, even though I claim 0 and single, and I have never owed before. I feel like I am doing something wrong. Does it sound right that I would end up owing that much or am I being double-taxed for something I already paid taxes on?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 19:53:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/i-had-restricted-stock-grants-vest-fidelity-sold-off-a-certain-of-them-to-cover-7k-taxes-then-i-sold/01/399349#M16210</guid>
      <dc:creator>MR-SC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-04T19:53:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>" Does it sound right that I would end up owing that much...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/does-it-sound-right-that-i-would-end-up-owing-that-much/01/399358#M16211</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;" Does it sound right that I would end up owing that much or am I being double-taxed for something I already paid taxes on?"&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;You may or may not being double taxed and you may or may not be double reporting your income.&amp;nbsp; And, IF you are in fact double reporting your income THEN almost certainly you are using the &lt;U&gt;wrong basis to report your sale&lt;/U&gt;.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;When an RSU (or "grant") vests you recognize compensation income due to the &lt;U&gt;simple act of vesting&lt;/U&gt;.&amp;nbsp; The sale of the stock is completely irrelevant to the calculation of compensation.&amp;nbsp; The compensation is calculated as:&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (&lt;B&gt;GROSS&lt;/B&gt; number of shares that vested) x (per share fair market value on vesting date - per share you paid)&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;(Most likely the "per share you paid" is $0, but I threw that in to keep the equation valid in virtually all circumstances.)&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;That's the number that's reported on your W-2 and since it uses the GROSS number of shares it's probably going to be higher that the proceeds you recognized on your sale since you sold a NET number of shares. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Your basis in the stock is NOT what you paid for it "out of pocket", (most likely $0), your basis in the GROSS number of shares you received is the same as the compensation reported on the W-2.&amp;nbsp; That means that your per share basis for any stock you sold is the &lt;U&gt;same as&lt;/U&gt; that "per share fair market value on vesting date - per share you paid."&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Assuming that your out of pocket cost per share is $0 that would mean that your per share basis would be the same as the per share FMV at vesting and that's the number you use for all stock sales.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;A "same day" sale usually results in a small loss due to selling commissions and fees.&amp;nbsp; Clearly that sale would not materially alter your taxable income nor your taxes.&amp;nbsp; You say you sold the stock "a short while" after you received them.&amp;nbsp; If the actual selling price was not materially different than the fair market price on the vesting date, then I wouldn't expect that it would have much income effect.&amp;nbsp; However, if the stock went up significantly in price then you could have a material increase in income and that could increase your tax liability; maybe even enough that the increase in tax is (coincidentally) about the same as the taxes withheld.&amp;nbsp; I simply don't know.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;However, brokers these days are only obligated to report on the 1099-B your "out of pocket" costs for the stock sold, not your actual basis which includes the compensation element.&amp;nbsp; You need to determine what your correct basis is by calculating (# of shares sold) x (per share fair market value on vesting date - per share you paid) and comparing that to whatever the broker has reported and what you used for the sale.&amp;nbsp; That will tell you if you're double reporting your income, or not.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Tom Young&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 19:53:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/investments-and-rental-properties/discussion/does-it-sound-right-that-i-would-end-up-owing-that-much/01/399358#M16211</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomYoung</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-04T19:53:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

