<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic How &amp;quot;Presumption of profit&amp;quot; works? in Business &amp; farm</title>
    <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/business-taxes/discussion/how-presumption-of-profit-works/01/254397#M8895</link>
    <description>So, I have "not-for-profit rental".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In Pub 527 it's written: &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;- "Report your not-for-profit rental income on Schedule 1 (Form 1040), line 21"&lt;BR /&gt;- "If your rental income is more than your rental expenses for at least 3 years out of a period of 5 consecutive years, you are presumed to be renting your property to make a profit."&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In TT, to report "not-for-profit rental" I just add "Other taxable income", like this: "Not-For-Profit Rental - $X". I don't fill out the Schedule E, nor deduct any expenses, becasue I'm doing Standard Deduction. I can't deduct expenses becasue it's not for profit and therefore "personal property".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Anyway, how the IRS will know if my "rental" was profitable or not? It doesn't know if I had profit, It doesn't even know the address of the property to check if it's indeed under the market value. It doesn't know how many days was this property rented. I don't understand how "Presumption of profit" works.</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2019 20:46:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>anonymous8</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-01T20:46:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How "Presumption of profit" works?</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/business-taxes/discussion/how-presumption-of-profit-works/01/254397#M8895</link>
      <description>So, I have "not-for-profit rental".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In Pub 527 it's written: &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;- "Report your not-for-profit rental income on Schedule 1 (Form 1040), line 21"&lt;BR /&gt;- "If your rental income is more than your rental expenses for at least 3 years out of a period of 5 consecutive years, you are presumed to be renting your property to make a profit."&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In TT, to report "not-for-profit rental" I just add "Other taxable income", like this: "Not-For-Profit Rental - $X". I don't fill out the Schedule E, nor deduct any expenses, becasue I'm doing Standard Deduction. I can't deduct expenses becasue it's not for profit and therefore "personal property".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Anyway, how the IRS will know if my "rental" was profitable or not? It doesn't know if I had profit, It doesn't even know the address of the property to check if it's indeed under the market value. It doesn't know how many days was this property rented. I don't understand how "Presumption of profit" works.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2019 20:46:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/business-taxes/discussion/how-presumption-of-profit-works/01/254397#M8895</guid>
      <dc:creator>anonymous8</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-01T20:46:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It depends.  Your question is a good one.  The answer is...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/business-taxes/discussion/it-depends-your-question-is-a-good-one-the-answer-is/01/254399#M8896</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;It depends.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/B&gt;Your question is a good one.&amp;nbsp; The answer is not so much that the IRS knows that your rental is a "not for profit" activity, but rather that it would be easy for them to tell that it is not a "for profit" activity if you tried to report it as such.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here's the idea:&amp;nbsp; the IRS may not know from you putting the income on line 21 that the rental income is not a fair-rental value for the dwelling you are renting.&amp;nbsp; However, if you were to report the rent you receive on Schedule E, and then the expenses, they could easily cross-reference the home with the Fair Rental Value on similar dwellings in your area and be able to tell immediately that you have a "not-for-profit" rental.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And, since you can't claim expenses (or QBI deduction either) against a not-for-profit rental on Line 21, it is extremely unlikely that they are going to question what is reported there.&amp;nbsp; (That doesn't mean that they&amp;nbsp;&lt;I&gt;can't&amp;nbsp;&lt;/I&gt;question it, though).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A "for-profit" activity does not actually have to have a&amp;nbsp;&lt;I&gt;gain&lt;/I&gt; to be considered a "for-profit" activity, because, even at a fair rental value, there are a number of reasons a rental activity could produce repeated losses.&amp;nbsp; However, many of these losses are&amp;nbsp;&lt;I&gt;recaptured&lt;/I&gt; when the rental activity is eventually sold.&amp;nbsp; But if you are renting below fair rental value, you are correct in not reporting the rental on Schedule E but rather on Line 21, Schedule 1.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2019 20:46:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/business-taxes/discussion/it-depends-your-question-is-a-good-one-the-answer-is/01/254399#M8896</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanielV01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-01T20:46:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Did I understand correctly, that "Presumption of profit"...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/business-taxes/discussion/did-i-understand-correctly-that-presumption-of-profit/01/254402#M8897</link>
      <description>Did I understand correctly, that "Presumption of profit" matters mostly (almost only) for people who report actual rental property on Schedule E? I mean.. Technically by reporting "not-for-profit" rental, I'm losing money. "For-profit" rental would get me more money, so I guess it would be really strange if IRS would fight to get less money. Would you agree?</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2019 20:46:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/business-taxes/discussion/did-i-understand-correctly-that-presumption-of-profit/01/254402#M8897</guid>
      <dc:creator>anonymous8</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-01T20:46:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Because a "for-profit" rental can deduct expenses, a "not...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/business-taxes/discussion/because-a-for-profit-rental-can-deduct-expenses-a-not/01/254406#M8899</link>
      <description>Because a "for-profit" rental can deduct expenses, a "not-for-profit" rental will get the IRS more money, because expenses cannot be deducted.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;In years past, expenses could be deducted up to the amount of income, which could be claimed if the rental owner was itemizing on a not-for-profit rental.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;But the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act did away with this deduction.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;So it actually works out in the IRS' interests to question rentals that are not "for-profit" rentals so that the income must be included and taxed, whereas "for-profit" rentals are allowed to have expenses claimed.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2019 20:46:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/business-taxes/discussion/because-a-for-profit-rental-can-deduct-expenses-a-not/01/254406#M8899</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanielV01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-01T20:46:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Simply saying, IRS would rather classify a property as "n...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/business-taxes/discussion/simply-saying-irs-would-rather-classify-a-property-as-n/01/254409#M8901</link>
      <description>Simply saying, IRS would rather classify a property as "not-for-profit" instead of "for-profit", correct?</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2019 20:46:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/business-taxes/discussion/simply-saying-irs-would-rather-classify-a-property-as-n/01/254409#M8901</guid>
      <dc:creator>anonymous8</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-01T20:46:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I imagine this year more than others the IRS will be look...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/business-taxes/discussion/i-imagine-this-year-more-than-others-the-irs-will-be-look/01/254412#M8902</link>
      <description>I imagine this year more than others the IRS will be looking to re-classify questionable rentals because of the QBI deduction as much as anything, as well as the disallowed deductions.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2019 20:46:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/business-taxes/discussion/i-imagine-this-year-more-than-others-the-irs-will-be-look/01/254412#M8902</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanielV01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-01T20:46:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

