<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic I had a breast augmentation revision for capsular contracture and rupture, is this deductible? in Deductions &amp; credits</title>
    <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/tax-credits-deductions/discussion/i-had-a-breast-augmentation-revision-for-capsular-contracture-and-rupture-is-this-deductible/01/284096#M34537</link>
    <description>Initial surgery was in 1997, complications arose in 2016 and I had the revision of breast augmentation in 2016</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 17:29:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>keltshan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-03T17:29:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>I had a breast augmentation revision for capsular contracture and rupture, is this deductible?</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/tax-credits-deductions/discussion/i-had-a-breast-augmentation-revision-for-capsular-contracture-and-rupture-is-this-deductible/01/284096#M34537</link>
      <description>Initial surgery was in 1997, complications arose in 2016 and I had the revision of breast augmentation in 2016</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 17:29:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/tax-credits-deductions/discussion/i-had-a-breast-augmentation-revision-for-capsular-contracture-and-rupture-is-this-deductible/01/284096#M34537</guid>
      <dc:creator>keltshan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-03T17:29:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yes.  While the original breast augmentation would not ha...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/tax-credits-deductions/discussion/yes-while-the-original-breast-augmentation-would-not-ha/01/284102#M34538</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;Yes.&lt;/B&gt;&amp;nbsp; While the original breast augmentation would &lt;B&gt;not &lt;/B&gt;have been considered a medical expense, the revision &lt;B&gt;is&lt;/B&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;

&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IRS &lt;A href="https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p502.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;Pub. 502 - Medical
and Dental Expenses&lt;/A&gt; defines medical expenses as:&amp;nbsp; "...the costs
of diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, and the
costs for treatments affecting any part or function of the body" &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 17:29:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/tax-credits-deductions/discussion/yes-while-the-original-breast-augmentation-would-not-ha/01/284102#M34538</guid>
      <dc:creator>IreneS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-03T17:29:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

