<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Section 199a - Salary Considerations in State tax filing</title>
    <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/state-taxes/discussion/section-199a-salary-considerations/01/387870#M16943</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Under Section 199a under the Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017, does it make sense for pass-through service entities, such as S-Corporations, to have the owners maximize their salary to take advantage of the 20% deduction for qualified business income? The relevant entities are service corporations (they do not sell a product).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 19:12:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>troy1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-04T19:12:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Section 199a - Salary Considerations</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/state-taxes/discussion/section-199a-salary-considerations/01/387870#M16943</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Under Section 199a under the Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017, does it make sense for pass-through service entities, such as S-Corporations, to have the owners maximize their salary to take advantage of the 20% deduction for qualified business income? The relevant entities are service corporations (they do not sell a product).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 19:12:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/state-taxes/discussion/section-199a-salary-considerations/01/387870#M16943</guid>
      <dc:creator>troy1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-04T19:12:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This is a forum for Turbotax users. TT is not licensed fo...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/state-taxes/discussion/this-is-a-forum-for-turbotax-users-tt-is-not-licensed-fo/01/387877#M16945</link>
      <description>This is a forum for Turbotax users. TT is not licensed for use by paid tax preparers.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 19:12:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/state-taxes/discussion/this-is-a-forum-for-turbotax-users-tt-is-not-licensed-fo/01/387877#M16945</guid>
      <dc:creator>SweetieJean</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-04T19:12:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NO... you MUST take a reasonable salary  ...  the IRS wil...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/state-taxes/discussion/no-you-must-take-a-reasonable-salary-the-irs-wil/01/387883#M16947</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;NO... you MUST take a reasonable salary&amp;nbsp; ...&amp;nbsp; the IRS will be watching for salary reductions and can hit you hard with penalties ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The IRS position is
that an S-Corporation MUST pay a reasonable compensation to an officer before
non-wage distributions may be made.&amp;nbsp; The reason is that they feel that
non-wage distributions when no wages are paid is an avoidance of social
security taxes.&amp;nbsp; From the IRS website at&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=203100,00.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=203100,00.html&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;:&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
"Reasonable Compensation&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
S corporations must pay reasonable
compensation to a shareholder-employee in return for services that the employee
provides to the corporation before non-wage distributions may be made to the
shareholder-employee. The amount of reasonable compensation will never exceed
the amount received by the shareholder either directly or indirectly.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Distributions and other payments by an S
corporation to a corporate officer must be treated as wages to the extent the
amounts are reasonable compensation for the service rendered to the
corporation.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Several court cases support the authority of
the IRS to reclassify other forms of payments to a shareholder-employee as a
wage expense and subject to employment taxes."&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The page cites Joly vs. Commissioner, 211 F.3d
1269 (6th Cir., 2000) as one judicial finding on the IRS's authority to
reclassify distributions to wages subject to employment taxes.&amp;nbsp; Factors to
determine reasonable compensation are given in the ruling.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The AICPA has an interesting article on this
topic here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.aicpa.org/publications/taxadviser/2011/august/pages/nitti_aug2011.aspx" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.aicpa.org/publications/taxadviser/2011/august/pages/nitti_aug2011.aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You also might want to read a lively
discussion on the Tax Almanac website here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.taxalmanac.org/index.php/Discussion_Forum_-_Tax_Questions" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.taxalmanac.org/index.php/Discussion_Forum_-_Tax_Questions&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;.&amp;nbsp; The substance of the discussion seems
to be that taking a reasonable salary is not optional and, if you took
distributions with no salary, the distributions should be changed to salary
with appropriate employment tax returns being filed (late, if necessary.)&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The fastest way to get audited as an
S-Corporation is to not report wages to officers on page 1 of the return.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 19:12:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/state-taxes/discussion/no-you-must-take-a-reasonable-salary-the-irs-wil/01/387883#M16947</guid>
      <dc:creator>Critter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-04T19:12:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Much appreciated! However, I was considering the notion t...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/state-taxes/discussion/much-appreciated-however-i-was-considering-the-notion-t/01/387887#M16949</link>
      <description>Much appreciated! However, I was considering the notion that since the deduction is limited to 50% of wages, you may want to increase your salary (within reasonable limits) to take advantage of this deduction</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 19:12:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/state-taxes/discussion/much-appreciated-however-i-was-considering-the-notion-t/01/387887#M16949</guid>
      <dc:creator>troy1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-04T19:12:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The IRS would love for all S-corp owners to increase thei...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/state-taxes/discussion/the-irs-would-love-for-all-s-corp-owners-to-increase-thei/01/387896#M16951</link>
      <description>The IRS would love for all S-corp owners to increase their wages to 100% of&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;the profits ... go ahead.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 19:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/state-taxes/discussion/the-irs-would-love-for-all-s-corp-owners-to-increase-thei/01/387896#M16951</guid>
      <dc:creator>Critter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-04T19:13:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thing #8: High Income Taxpayers Need Employees or Propert...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/state-taxes/discussion/thing-8-high-income-taxpayers-need-employees-or-propert/01/387904#M16952</link>
      <description>Thing #8: High Income Taxpayers Need Employees or Property&lt;P&gt;The law requires high-income taxpayers to either pay wages or hold depreciable property in order to get the Sec. 199A deduction.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A “high-income” taxpayer includes single taxpayers making more than $157,500 and married taxpayers filing joint returns making more than $315,000.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These extra requirements get complicated quickly, but basically the Sec. 199A deduction can’t be more than either 50% of W-2 wages or 25% of W-2 wages plus 2.5 percent times depreciable property.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;
  &lt;A href="https://evergreensmallbusiness.com/pass-thru-income-deduction-dozen-things-every-business-owner-must-know/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;https://evergreensmallbusiness.com/pass-thru-income-deduction-dozen-things-every-business-owner-must...&lt;/A&gt;
  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 19:13:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/state-taxes/discussion/thing-8-high-income-taxpayers-need-employees-or-propert/01/387904#M16952</guid>
      <dc:creator>Critter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-04T19:13:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

