<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Turbotax error, or odd loophole for Qualified Education Program distributions for non-dependents? in Get your taxes done using TurboTax</title>
    <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/taxes/discussion/turbotax-error-or-odd-loophole-for-qualified-education-program-distributions-for-non-dependents/01/2502525#M896603</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am a Head of Household filer and have two minor children in K-12 private school, for whom I take annual distributions from their respective 529 plans, of which I am the plan owner and they are the designated beneficiary, and pay for their tuition.&amp;nbsp; The tuition total is greater than the $10,000 limit for K-12 education, so I expect to pay income tax and the 10% Additional Tax on the proportional earnings portion of the excess distributions.&amp;nbsp; In past years, when I claimed both children as dependents, and Turbotax has calculated the tax exactly as I expected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This year, for tax year 2021, one of my children will be claimed as a dependent by their other parent and, therefore, will appear in my return as a non-dependent.&amp;nbsp; That change (from having the designated beneficiary on the 1099-Q as a dependent in past years to a non-dependent for 2021) has Turbotax calculating zero income tax or Additional Tax for the earnings portions of the excess distributions for that child.&amp;nbsp; While this would be a pleasant surprise, it doesn't seem consistent with the tax code.&amp;nbsp; For fun, I've swapped the children as dependent and non-dependent, and the result is consistent; the dependent child's excess distributions get calculated as I expect and the non-dependent child's excess distributions do not get taxed at all.&amp;nbsp; I've also tried to force the worksheets for the non-dependent child to match what I expect the tax to be, but those fields aren't editable by me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm looking for ideas...&amp;nbsp; Am I missing something in the way I'm entering the data into Turbotax?&amp;nbsp; Am I missing a pleasant surprise in the tax code?&amp;nbsp; Or might this be an edge case that Turbotax doesn't handle as expected?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 05:27:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jerrydbuy1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-03-09T05:27:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Turbotax error, or odd loophole for Qualified Education Program distributions for non-dependents?</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/taxes/discussion/turbotax-error-or-odd-loophole-for-qualified-education-program-distributions-for-non-dependents/01/2502525#M896603</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am a Head of Household filer and have two minor children in K-12 private school, for whom I take annual distributions from their respective 529 plans, of which I am the plan owner and they are the designated beneficiary, and pay for their tuition.&amp;nbsp; The tuition total is greater than the $10,000 limit for K-12 education, so I expect to pay income tax and the 10% Additional Tax on the proportional earnings portion of the excess distributions.&amp;nbsp; In past years, when I claimed both children as dependents, and Turbotax has calculated the tax exactly as I expected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This year, for tax year 2021, one of my children will be claimed as a dependent by their other parent and, therefore, will appear in my return as a non-dependent.&amp;nbsp; That change (from having the designated beneficiary on the 1099-Q as a dependent in past years to a non-dependent for 2021) has Turbotax calculating zero income tax or Additional Tax for the earnings portions of the excess distributions for that child.&amp;nbsp; While this would be a pleasant surprise, it doesn't seem consistent with the tax code.&amp;nbsp; For fun, I've swapped the children as dependent and non-dependent, and the result is consistent; the dependent child's excess distributions get calculated as I expect and the non-dependent child's excess distributions do not get taxed at all.&amp;nbsp; I've also tried to force the worksheets for the non-dependent child to match what I expect the tax to be, but those fields aren't editable by me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm looking for ideas...&amp;nbsp; Am I missing something in the way I'm entering the data into Turbotax?&amp;nbsp; Am I missing a pleasant surprise in the tax code?&amp;nbsp; Or might this be an edge case that Turbotax doesn't handle as expected?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 05:27:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/taxes/discussion/turbotax-error-or-odd-loophole-for-qualified-education-program-distributions-for-non-dependents/01/2502525#M896603</guid>
      <dc:creator>jerrydbuy1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-09T05:27:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Turbotax error, or odd loophole for Qualified Education Program distributions for non-depende...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/taxes/discussion/re-turbotax-error-or-odd-loophole-for-qualified-education-program-distributions-for-non-depende/01/2506407#M898018</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When you enter the Tuition and Enrollment Fees for the non-dependent, please limit that entry to 10,000.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt; 
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt; 
&lt;P&gt;Only 10,000 of Elementary and Secondary education expenses can be claimed per student per tax year.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt; 
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt; 
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://lithium-response-prod.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/turbotax.response.lithium.com/RESPONSEIMAGE/c8d15060-02d4-4a19-b279-8e6fb3407e36.default.JPG" style="height:698px; width:1024px" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt; 
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt; 
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt; 
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 20:40:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/taxes/discussion/re-turbotax-error-or-odd-loophole-for-qualified-education-program-distributions-for-non-depende/01/2506407#M898018</guid>
      <dc:creator>KrisD15</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-21T20:40:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Turbotax error, or odd loophole for Qualified Education Program distributions for non-depende...</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/taxes/discussion/re-turbotax-error-or-odd-loophole-for-qualified-education-program-distributions-for-non-depende/01/2507834#M898640</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&amp;nbsp; That did indeed produce the results I was expecting.&amp;nbsp; Not at all intuitive, or consistent with how dependent student expenses are handled, but a good enough work-around.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 02:47:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/taxes/discussion/re-turbotax-error-or-odd-loophole-for-qualified-education-program-distributions-for-non-depende/01/2507834#M898640</guid>
      <dc:creator>jerrydbuy1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-22T02:47:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

