<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Employer Education Assistance Program in Get your taxes done using TurboTax</title>
    <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/taxes/discussion/employer-education-assistance-program/01/3116237#M1141684</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, my employer has a USC Section 127 educational assistance program. The first part of the program pays up to $3,000 per year for tuition assistance. In this policy, they state that any assistance over $3,000 will be taxed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The second part of the program is for loan repayment. They give $20,000 split over 4 years in yearly payments of $2,500, $5,000, $5,000, and $7,500. These are paid directly to the loan servicer. In this policy, they also state that any assistance over $3,000 will be taxed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I asked why they are not using the federal maximum exclusion of $5,250 (instead of the current $3,000) I got this response:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#800000"&gt;"The Consolidated Appropriations Act passed at the end of 2020, moved employer-provided student loan repayment plans under the same education assistance tax law as tuition reimbursement. Since the non-taxable tuition reimbursement benefit is limited to $3,000 per year, that in turn becomes the non-taxable limit on the loan repayment benefit."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I look a the relevant laws I don't see why they can't use the federal maximum exclusion of $5,250 while maintaining the same benefit payments for each program.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Am I missing something?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 08:23:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>plmetz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-02-24T08:23:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Employer Education Assistance Program</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/taxes/discussion/employer-education-assistance-program/01/3116237#M1141684</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, my employer has a USC Section 127 educational assistance program. The first part of the program pays up to $3,000 per year for tuition assistance. In this policy, they state that any assistance over $3,000 will be taxed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The second part of the program is for loan repayment. They give $20,000 split over 4 years in yearly payments of $2,500, $5,000, $5,000, and $7,500. These are paid directly to the loan servicer. In this policy, they also state that any assistance over $3,000 will be taxed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I asked why they are not using the federal maximum exclusion of $5,250 (instead of the current $3,000) I got this response:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#800000"&gt;"The Consolidated Appropriations Act passed at the end of 2020, moved employer-provided student loan repayment plans under the same education assistance tax law as tuition reimbursement. Since the non-taxable tuition reimbursement benefit is limited to $3,000 per year, that in turn becomes the non-taxable limit on the loan repayment benefit."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I look a the relevant laws I don't see why they can't use the federal maximum exclusion of $5,250 while maintaining the same benefit payments for each program.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Am I missing something?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 08:23:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/taxes/discussion/employer-education-assistance-program/01/3116237#M1141684</guid>
      <dc:creator>plmetz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-24T08:23:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Employer Education Assistance Program</title>
      <link>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/taxes/discussion/re-employer-education-assistance-program/01/3116260#M1141690</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Q.&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Am I missing something?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A. No.&amp;nbsp; But, I can't quote you "chapter and verse".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It seems you've already done the research. I suggest you take your findings to&amp;nbsp; your employer.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2023 16:35:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/taxes/discussion/re-employer-education-assistance-program/01/3116260#M1141690</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hal_Al</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-14T16:35:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

