You'll need to sign in or create an account to connect with an expert.
The Capital Gains that are reported on the 1099-DIV in 2a, are not treated as ordinary income. They are included with Capital Gains which may result in a lower tax rate than that of ordinary income.
There has to be a way for the system to show how the different Capital Gains are treated with a different tax rate rather than adding it all together, as shown by the Adjusted Gross Income line of the 1040, which after deductions is directly used to obtain the Taxable income and to calculate the final tax, a calculation that obviously is not plainly applying the 24% tax bracket formula, for example, but rather becomes a mix bag of $ by just looking at the “secretly calculated by appearance” final tax $ TurboTax shows.
My point is that TurboTax internally may do all those calculations well but it will be useful for the tax payer if the software is more open to show what part of the income is taxed at what % and what other part is taxed at the 24% tax bracket formula for example. As it is, the software just collects the data and massages it into a black box to come up with a single tax $ number for the 1040, rather than also educate the payer about how the final tax dollar number on the 1040 is obtained.
This is not an issue of distrust of what TurboTax does but rather to educate the tax payer, and software payer, with a logical presentation how the final tax is calculated based on the data provided.
Still have questions?
Questions are answered within a few hours on average.
Post a Question*Must create login to post
Ask questions and learn more about your taxes and finances.
tjreilly1
Level 1
vg101
New Member
fredwunderlich
Level 2
user17762206873
New Member
mlppa03
New Member