My rental income minus expenses and depreciation ends up being negative. How come I still have to pay tax on the rental income before the expenses and depreciation? Shouldn't my tax be zero if my expenses and depreciation exceed the rental income?
You'll need to sign in or create an account to connect with an expert.
Not necessarily. It may be that your personal use of the property exceeded the greater of 14 days or 10% of the days it was rented. Also, you may have rented it for less that the fair market value of the rental. Both of these situations would result in the denial of deducting expenses against the rental income by the IRS.
Thanks for the response. I did rent it at the fair market value and I didn't use it for personal use. So, why am I still being taxed for the rental income when the rental income is negative (after all expenses and depreciation is calculated)? Need some help here.
It depends. Even if your rental shows a “negative” result after expenses and depreciation, the IRS often does not let you deduct that loss against your other income. That means you can still owe tax on the gross rental income even though your net rental result is negative on paper. This is almost always caused by the Passive Activity Loss (PAL) rules and income limitations, not by personal use or fair‑market‑value issues. Here are some reasons why your negative income" might not be lowering your tax bill.
If your income is above the phase‑out range, you get zero current‑year deduction, even if your rental loss is large.
Still have questions?
Questions are answered within a few hours on average.
Post a Question*Must create login to post
Ask questions and learn more about your taxes and finances.
geobon72
New Member
jingle123
Returning Member
noel-rydecki
New Member
neal-cfl9
New Member
zenitram2
Level 2